Le 23-sept.-05, à 16:29, Hal Ruhl a écrit :
Hi Bruno:
At 06:04 AM 9/23/2005, you wrote:
Le 22-sept.-05, à 18:12, John M a écrit :
Bruno:
according to your (and Marc's?) definition,
is Hal's work a "TOEandTON"?
The problem, for me, is with the "T" (both in TOE and TON).
I cannot ju
Hi, Hal and Bruno,
the "T" is my problem as well (I swalloed it) because
ALL (pardon the pun) we may know is within the feeble
capabilities of our little minds and I have no right
to assume that 'nature' does not include much more
than this little segment. This is why I call whatever
I find out i
Hi Bruno:
At 06:04 AM 9/23/2005, you wrote:
Le 22-sept.-05, à 18:12, John M a écrit :
Bruno:
according to your (and Marc's?) definition,
is Hal's work a "TOEandTON"?
The problem, for me, is with the "T" (both in TOE and TON).
I cannot judge. Hal's talk is still too much vague for me.
3 matches
Mail list logo