Refinements to the next stages of my model.
Proposal
A type #2 universe can look and evolve like our universe.
Justification: Stage 1
Designate the succession of states for universe j as Sj(i) and its
representative binary bit string as Uj(i) where i runs over some range of
integers from 1
Further improvememts.
Proposal:
The concepts of Nothing and Everything [1def] are not antagonistic,
but are actually synergistic and bootstrap existence.
Justification:
AXIOMS:
Referring first to [1def] through [6def]:
1) A void consisting of the absence of factuals herein called the
I post this again to fix a small but important error and to sustain a
single thread title.
Proposition 8: The dynamic of Proposition 5 is random.
Proof: Same form of proof as for Proposition 5.
Effect: I tried here to select a word that encompassed a
sufficiently wide range of influences so
presented more traditionally
The following is a new effort to present my model in a more traditional
way.
SNIP
The following is a new effort to present my model in a more traditional
way.
The basic idea is that the concepts of nothing and everything [i.e. a
maximum expression of something] are not totally antagonistic but are
actually synergistic.
DEFINITIONS:
1) Information: The potential to parse
5 matches
Mail list logo