Re: My model presented more traditionally

2002-10-24 Thread H J Ruhl
Refinements to the next stages of my model. Proposal A type #2 universe can look and evolve like our universe. Justification: Stage 1 Designate the succession of states for universe j as Sj(i) and its representative binary bit string as Uj(i) where i runs over some range of integers from 1

Re: My model presented more traditionally

2002-10-17 Thread H J Ruhl
Further improvememts. Proposal: The concepts of Nothing and Everything [1def] are not antagonistic, but are actually synergistic and bootstrap existence. Justification: AXIOMS: Referring first to [1def] through [6def]: 1) A void consisting of the absence of factuals herein called the

Re: My model presented more traditionally

2002-10-12 Thread H J Ruhl
I post this again to fix a small but important error and to sustain a single thread title. Proposition 8: The dynamic of Proposition 5 is random. Proof: Same form of proof as for Proposition 5. Effect: I tried here to select a word that encompassed a sufficiently wide range of influences so

Re: My model presented more traditionally

2002-10-11 Thread jamikes
presented more traditionally The following is a new effort to present my model in a more traditional way. SNIP

My model presented more traditionally

2002-10-10 Thread H J Ruhl
The following is a new effort to present my model in a more traditional way. The basic idea is that the concepts of nothing and everything [i.e. a maximum expression of something] are not totally antagonistic but are actually synergistic. DEFINITIONS: 1) Information: The potential to parse