Hi Stephen P. King
I have trouble conceiving an isomorphism (or anything comparative) between
something that is there and something that is not. The something
that is not there is not the absence of the thing that was,
since it has no shape, no location, and cannot be found by a physical
search.
Hi Stephen P. King
OK, I can understand that at least in princiople. I recall a statement
by the famous Maharishi Yogi from way back:
Knowledge is structured in consciousness.
I had forgotten the structured part.
To my mind at least, that explains why nature
shows structure as well. A
Hi Craig Weinberg
OK that's the classic example of the pin prick and feeling pain.
It works for the worlds of apples and oranges if you accept
Hume's and Leibniz's theory of causation, or at least my understanding of it,
namely that changes in the mental world are simply synchronized
with
On 9/22/2012 6:11 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
OK that's the classic example of the pin prick and feeling pain.
It works for the worlds of apples and oranges if you accept
Hume's and Leibniz's theory of causation, or at least my understanding of it,
namely that changes in the
4 matches
Mail list logo
