As I had mentioned in a previous post, complementarity doesn't even
crack a mention in the textbook I learnt QM from (Shankar's book). I
found it in another textbook I had (Schiff's book), which describes it
as being a another way of expressing Heisenberg's uncertainty
princple. I'm not even sure t
John M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aan: "Saibal Mitra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Verzonden: Saturday, August 14, 2004 04:51 PM
Onderwerp: Re: Quantum Rebel - complementarity
> Thanks! Maybe even further?
> John M
> - Original Message -
han the one you
actually measured...
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "Brent Meeker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aan: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Verzonden: Saturday, August 14, 2004 10:19 AM
Onderwerp: RE: Quantum Rebel - complementarity
> If it can't deal with EPR, what go
If it can't deal with EPR, what good is it?
Brent Meeker
>-Original Message-
>From: Saibal Mitra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 2:35 PM
>To: Russell Standish; John M
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Quantum Rebel - complementarity
&g
Thanks! Maybe even further?
John M
- Original Message -
From: "Saibal Mitra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Russell Standish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "John M"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 10:35 AM
Maybe we should look at deterministic theories, such as:
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0104219
John M wrote:
> Yet it would be refreshing to approach the concept from another side
> (another framework), - maybe a new one??
Dear Russell,
I really would like to read (if ever) about that darn complementarity -
based on/around a different example from the stale double-slit experiment
(which it was really constructed for).
IMO the 'double' nature of particle-wave is not (well?) understood and this
resulted in sweating o
7 matches
Mail list logo
