RITSIAR (was Numbers, Machine and Father Ted)

2006-11-03 Thread Bruno Marchal
Le 02-nov.-06, à 17:34, David Nyman a écrit : > > > Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> I don't understand really what you mean by "AUDA is not RITSIAR". AUDA >> is just the lobian interview, or if you prefer the complete >> mathematical formalization of the UDA reasoning. In some sense you can >> interp

Re: RITSIAR (was Numbers, Machine and Father Ted)

2006-11-03 Thread 1Z
Bruno Marchal wrote: > Le 02-nov.-06, à 17:34, David Nyman a écrit : > > > > > > > > Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > >> I don't understand really what you mean by "AUDA is not RITSIAR". AUDA > >> is just the lobian interview, or if you prefer the complete > >> mathematical formalization of the UDA rea

Re: RITSIAR (was Numbers, Machine and Father Ted)

2006-11-09 Thread Bruno Marchal
Le 03-nov.-06, à 15:06, 1Z a écrit : > We don't *have* to assume that there is a gulf between the first > personal > and third personal. A gulf? Do you agree there is at least a difference? Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You

Re: RITSIAR (was Numbers, Machine and Father Ted)

2006-11-09 Thread 1Z
Bruno Marchal wrote: > Le 03-nov.-06, à 15:06, 1Z a écrit : > > > We don't *have* to assume that there is a gulf between the first > > personal > > and third personal. > > > A gulf? Do you agree there is at least a difference? The difference boils down to the incommuncability of certain things,

Re: RITSIAR (was Numbers, Machine and Father Ted)

2006-11-09 Thread Bruno Marchal
Le 09-nov.-06, à 13:57, 1Z a écrit : > > > Bruno Marchal wrote: >> Le 03-nov.-06, à 15:06, 1Z a écrit : >> >>> We don't *have* to assume that there is a gulf between the first >>> personal >>> and third personal. >> >> >> A gulf? Do you agree there is at least a difference? > > > The difference