on; rszapp; rffarmer; rakman; kosz; johnwagner;
> farmerr; eric_stroud; Andrea S Kishne; David Bonnell (pref.); makoilaci; -
> derek abbott
> *Subject:* Re: Re: Are EM waves and/or their fields physical ?
>
> ** **
>
> "As for what light is, keep in mind that we do k
---
> *From:* David Bonnell
> *Receiver:* dfine
> *Time:* 2013-01-16, 15:44:10
> *Subject:* Re: Are EM waves and/or their fields physical ?
>
> The speed of light is altered when photons move in a medium whose index
> of refraction is greater than that of the vacuum (
e: 2013-01-16, 15:44:10
Subject: Re: Are EM waves and/or their fields physical ?
The speed of light is altered when photons move in a medium whose index of
refraction is greater than that of the vacuum ("raw" space). This change is
what causes alterations in the movement of light
e, especially near the end." - Woody Allen
>
> - Receiving the following content -
> From: Richard Ruquist
> Receiver: everything-list
> Time: 2013-01-10, 11:47:26
> Subject: Re: Re: Are EM waves and/or their fields physical ?
>
> Well Roger,
>
> Think of the n
Is experimentation even theoretically possible at the Planck length/width?
This could effect EM, and, of course also impacts your Light post.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l
rd Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-10, 11:47:26
Subject: Re: Re: Are EM waves and/or their fields physical ?
Well Roger,
Think of the number infinities that Bruno is always referencing to.
Think of the number infinities in terms of a
static MWI deterministic Block Universe BU.
T
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 2:08:35 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>>
>>
>> >>
>> >> Only the 1p perspective is dynamic
>> >> or causes dynamicism- changes in the Block Universe.
>>
>> I should have mentioned that the Mind is a block univers
content -
> Sender: makoilaci
> Receiver: Roger Clough
> Time: 2013-01-09, 12:15:42
> Subject: Re: Are EM waves and/or their fields physical ?
>
>
> *just the opposite. general relativity brought aether back, but it is
> 4-dimensonal.
>
> *--
>
> On Wed,
On Thursday, January 10, 2013 2:08:35 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>
>
> >>
> >> Only the 1p perspective is dynamic
> >> or causes dynamicism- changes in the Block Universe.
>
> I should have mentioned that the Mind is a block universe
> but not necessarily the physical universe(s).
>
>
I see Mi
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:42:06 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Craig Weinberg
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:47:26 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> But
On Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:42:06 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Craig Weinberg
> >
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:47:26 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> But in the end the magic of consciousness
> >> requires a 1p
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:47:26 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> But in the end the magic of consciousness
>> requires a 1p leap of faith.
>
>
> And vice versa.That's because they are the same thing. Consciousness is
> litera
13 at 8:33 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
>> Hi Richard Ruquist
>>
>> Sounds a little fantastic to me, but what do I know ?
>>
>>
>> [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
>> 1/10/2013
>> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Al
On Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:47:26 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>
>
>
> But in the end the magic of consciousness
> requires a 1p leap of faith.
>
And vice versa.That's because they are the same thing. Consciousness is
literally a leap across mechanism, computation, and physics. That is what
> 1/10/2013
> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen
>
> - Receiving the following content -----
> From: Richard Ruquist
> Receiver: everything-list
> Time: 2013-01-09, 10:29:00
> Subject: Re: Are EM waves and/or their fields physical ?
>
> O
Time: 2013-01-09, 10:29:00
Subject: Re: Are EM waves and/or their fields physical ?
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 09 Jan 2013, at 13:04, Roger Clough wrote:
>
>> Bruno,
>>
>> Another matter is that since the michaelson-morley experimen
the aether is being replaced by new theories.
- Have received the following content -
Sender: makoilaci
Receiver: Roger Clough
Time: 2013-01-09, 12:15:42
Subject: Re: Are EM waves and/or their fields physical ?
just the opposite. general relativity brought aether back, but it
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 09 Jan 2013, at 13:04, Roger Clough wrote:
>
>> Bruno,
>>
>> Another matter is that since the michaelson-morley experiment,
>> space itself does not exist (is nonphysical).
>
>
> Space-time remains physical, here.
>
>
>> There is no aeth
On 09 Jan 2013, at 13:04, Roger Clough wrote:
Bruno,
Another matter is that since the michaelson-morley experiment,
space itself does not exist (is nonphysical).
Space-time remains physical, here.
There is no aether.
Electromagnetic waves propagate through nothing at all,
suggesting to me
19 matches
Mail list logo
