Hi Roger,
I would say the opposite - energy not being conserved would pose a harder
challenge to materialism, because then you'd have to ask where it comes
from and where it goes.
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Does energy obey the laws of
Hi Telmo Menezes
Good point. The answer is the same source that the
universe came from.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-20, 10:37:56
Subject: Re: Does energy obey the laws of materialism ?
Hi Roger,
I would say
Energy is conserved because we want our theories to be time translation invariant (c.f.
Noether's theorem).
Brent
On 1/20/2013 7:37 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi Roger,
I would say the opposite - energy not being conserved would pose a harder challenge to
materialism, because then you'd have
Is it fair, to call energy, matter in motion? Is it matter with momentum?
Since Photons are massless and so are neutrinos, are they just types of
energy, or primal energy, or proto-matter (wanna-be?).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything
4 matches
Mail list logo
