Time: 2012-12-03, 17:13:57
Subject: Re: One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
On 12/3/2012 8:54 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
RC,
So the entire universe can be in 1p at all times.
RR
Dear Richard,
How would one prove that all observations that that 1p has are
mutually consistent? Unless
Stephan,
I do assume simultaneity within the monads for the very reasons you
specify plus a few more like it makes Cramer's Transactional Analysis
instantaneous and Feymann's QED as well. Quantum Electrodynamics is
the most accurate theory compared to experiment extant yet is based on
particles
On 12/8/2012 8:02 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
For what it's worth, I think Richard referred to
Indra's Beads in connection with this problem. Every monad
has its own myriad set of perceptions of the other monads,
but these are indirect (are constantly updated by the Supreme
Bp Dt p
Bruno
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/8/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-03, 17:13:57
Subject: Re: One cannot have
-
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-06, 09:50:18
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Entities are either in spacetime (physical
-05, 13:00:30
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
Mapping refers to the perception of the monads.
The string theory monads exist in space
but have properties that effectively
put them outside of spacetime.
They are not simply ideas
if string theory is correct
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-05, 09:34:15
Subject: Re: Re: Re: One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
Roger does not understand my argument that the monads of string theory
are effectively inextended despite they being uniformly distributed
throughout the universe at a density of 10
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
*From:* Richard Ruquist javascript:
*Receiver:* everything-list javascript:
*Time:* 2012-12-05, 13:00:30
*Subject:* Re: Re: Re: Re: One cannot have 1p if there is no observer
Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-03, 08:54:30
Subject: Re: Re: One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
RC,
So the entire universe can be in 1p at all times.
RR
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Roger Clough rclo
:30
Subject: Re: Re: One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
RC,
So the entire universe can be in 1p at all times.
RR
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Yes, God is the supreme observer. See Leibniz.
The supreme monad sees all
: 2012-12-05, 09:34:15
Subject: Re: Re: Re: One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
Roger does not understand my argument that the monads of string theory
are effectively inextended despite they being uniformly distributed
throughout the universe at a density of 10^90/cc because each monad
maps
-05, 09:34:15
Subject: Re: Re: Re: One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
Roger does not understand my argument that the monads of string theory
are effectively inextended despite they being uniformly distributed
throughout the universe at a density of 10^90/cc because each monad
maps
javascript:
*Receiver:* everything-list javascript:
*Time:* 2012-12-05, 09:34:15
*Subject:* Re: Re: Re: One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
Roger does not understand my argument that the monads of string theory
are effectively inextended despite they being uniformly distributed
Roger,
Isn't your god an observer?
Richard
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/3/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving
: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-03, 05:59:05
Subject: Re: One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
Roger,
Isn't your god an observer?
Richard
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
[Roger Clough], [rclo
is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-03, 05:59:05
Subject: Re: One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
Roger,
Isn't your god an observer?
Richard
On Mon, Dec 3
On 12/3/2012 8:54 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
RC,
So the entire universe can be in 1p at all times.
RR
Dear Richard,
How would one prove that all observations that that 1p has are
mutually consistent? Unless you assume that the speed of light is
infinite, and thus there exists a unique
17 matches
Mail list logo
