: 2012-11-20, 19:00:51
Subject: Re: Re: Two possible ways of creating actual objects out of nothing
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:31:05AM -0500, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Russell Standish
I did land on your website or look up your book.
You do have some radical assumptions, one of
them puzzling
, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Russell Standish
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-11-19, 18:56:44
Subject: Re: Two possible ways of creating actual objects out of nothing
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:20:45AM -0500, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:31:05AM -0500, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Russell Standish
I did land on your website or look up your book.
You do have some radical assumptions, one of
them puzzling to me-- that time is an external variable.
External to what ? mind ? the physical world ?
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:20:45AM -0500, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Russell Standish
According to a web page, havege is probably the
best random number generator known, but it still
is not a true random number gen. There must be
They are probably being modest. What they have is as close to
4 matches
Mail list logo