Re: Re: Re: Two possible ways of creating actual objects out of nothing

2012-11-21 Thread Roger Clough
: 2012-11-20, 19:00:51 Subject: Re: Re: Two possible ways of creating actual objects out of nothing On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:31:05AM -0500, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Russell Standish I did land on your website or look up your book. You do have some radical assumptions, one of them puzzling

Re: Re: Two possible ways of creating actual objects out of nothing

2012-11-20 Thread Roger Clough
, especially near the end. -Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Russell Standish Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-19, 18:56:44 Subject: Re: Two possible ways of creating actual objects out of nothing On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:20:45AM -0500, Roger Clough wrote: Hi

Re: Re: Two possible ways of creating actual objects out of nothing

2012-11-20 Thread Russell Standish
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:31:05AM -0500, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Russell Standish I did land on your website or look up your book. You do have some radical assumptions, one of them puzzling to me-- that time is an external variable. External to what ? mind ? the physical world ?

Re: Two possible ways of creating actual objects out of nothing

2012-11-19 Thread Russell Standish
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:20:45AM -0500, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Russell Standish According to a web page, havege is probably the best random number generator known, but it still is not a true random number gen. There must be They are probably being modest. What they have is as close to