of words as I can muster.
Hal
-Original Message-
From: everything-l...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-l...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 3:25 AM
To: everything-l...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a
; "The N(k) are thus unstable with respect to their "empty"
>>>> condition. They
>>>> each must at some point spontaneously "seek" to encompass this
>>>> stability
>>>> distinction. They become evolving S(i) [call them eS(i)].&q
[call them eS(i)]."
>>>
>>> I have used this Nothing to Something transformation trigger for
>>> many years
>>> in other posts and did not notice that this time the wording was
>>> not as
>>> clear as it could have been.
>>>
>
However, this lack of clarity seems to have been useful given your
>> discussion of inconsistency driven traces. I had not considered this
>> before.
>>
>> Yours
>>
>> Hal
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: everything-l...@googlegroups.c
g-l...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Abram Demski
> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 12:59 AM
> To: everything-l...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD?
>
>
> Hal,
>
> I do not understand why the Nothings are fundamentally incomplete. I
>
On Behalf Of Abram Demski
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 12:59 AM
To: everything-l...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD?
Hal,
I do not understand why the Nothings are fundamentally incomplete. I
interpreted this as inconsistency, partly due to the following line:
bols.
>
> Original Message-
> From: everything-l...@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:everything-l...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Abram Demski
> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 3:10 PM
> To: everything-l...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD?
&
to my approach. Is it a UD?
Hal,
Is there a pattern to how the system responds to its own
incompleteness? You say that there is not a pattern to the traces, but
what do you mean by that?
---
That is not what I actually said. I indicated that there were no
restrictions on the copy
Hal
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: everything-l...@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:everything-l...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
> Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 5:36 AM
> To: everything-l...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Revisions t
erything-l...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-l...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 5:36 AM
To: everything-l...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD?
Hi Hal,
To see if your system is a UD, the first thing to do should
Hi Hal,
To see if your system is a UD, the first thing to do should consist in
writing a program capable of simulating it on a computer, and then to
see for which value of some parameters (on which it is supposed to
dovetail) it simulates a universal Turing machine.
To simulate it on a comp
Hi everyone:
I have revised my model somewhat and think it might now be a form of UD.
DEFINITIONS:
Distinction:
That which enables separation [such as red from other colors].
Devisor:
That which encloses a quantity of distinction. Some divisors are
collections of divisors. A de
12 matches
Mail list logo