On Monday, October 14, 2013 12:13:43 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 14 Oct 2013, at 17:09, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sunday, October 13, 2013 5:05:46 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >
> > On 13 Oct 2013, at 06:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Saturda
On 14 Oct 2013, at 17:09, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, October 13, 2013 5:05:46 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Oct 2013, at 06:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 3:54:29 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 10/12/2013 12:49 AM, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
Yes, but you se
On Sunday, October 13, 2013 5:58:03 PM UTC-4, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 04:25:50PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >
> > On 13 Oct 2013, at 12:24, Russell Standish wrote:
> >
> > >How do we know that those 3 hypostases exhaust the possibilities for
> > >logics contain
Right on, Brent!
*"**Emergence is a description of how we think about our models of the
world - not something in the world. So Bruno has a theory in which some
parts are true but incommunicable. He identifies these with qualia because
that is (supposedly) a characteristic of qualia. That's actu
On Sunday, October 13, 2013 5:05:46 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 13 Oct 2013, at 06:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, October 12, 2013 3:54:29 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>>
>> On 10/12/2013 12:49 AM, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
>>
>> Yes, but you see, even the food we get from
On 13 Oct 2013, at 23:58, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 04:25:50PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Oct 2013, at 12:24, Russell Standish wrote:
How do we know that those 3 hypostases exhaust the possibilities for
logics containing true but incommunicable sentences?
Who
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 04:25:50PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 13 Oct 2013, at 12:24, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> >How do we know that those 3 hypostases exhaust the possibilities for
> >logics containing true but incommunicable sentences?
>
> Who ever said that they exhaust them?
>
> On
On 13 Oct 2013, at 12:24, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:05:46AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Oct 2013, at 06:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 3:54:29 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 10/12/2013 12:49 AM, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
Yes, but you see,
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:05:46AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 13 Oct 2013, at 06:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >On Saturday, October 12, 2013 3:54:29 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
> >On 10/12/2013 12:49 AM, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
> >>Yes, but you see, even the food we get from the rest
On 13 Oct 2013, at 06:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 3:54:29 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 10/12/2013 12:49 AM, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
Yes, but you see, even the food we get from the restaurant, is
delicious. Why would it be delicious, assuming COMP. How could the
p
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 3:54:29 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>
> On 10/12/2013 12:49 AM, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
>
> Yes, but you see, even the food we get from the restaurant, is delicious.
> Why would it be delicious, assuming COMP. How could the primary modalities
> of things be good or
On 10/12/2013 12:49 AM, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
Yes, but you see, even the food we get from the restaurant, is delicious. Why would it
be delicious, assuming COMP. How could the primary modalities of things be good or bad
assuming COMP? I know most people here think Craig is a hand waver, but I
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 12:34:42 AM UTC-4, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
>
>
> Hey Craig, thanks for the feedback. Please refer to below:
> On Friday, October 11, 2013 5:10:39 AM UTC-4, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, October 11, 2013 2:58:13 AM UTC-4, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
>>>
>
On 12 Oct 2013, at 07:00, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/11/2013 9:44 PM, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
Sometimes, Bruno, I get the feeling as though you are a chef at a
restaurant with a wonderful menu, but whenever anyone orders an
item on it, all you can do is give them exactly the same picture of
t
On 12 Oct 2013, at 06:44, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
On Friday, October 11, 2013 5:18:44 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 11 Oct 2013, at 08:58, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
The vocable "I" becomes attached to each impulse that arises in a
psychic complex, no matter how mutually contradictory
Yes, but you see, even the food we get from the restaurant, is delicious.
Why would it be delicious, assuming COMP. How could the primary modalities
of things be good or bad assuming COMP? I know most people here think Craig
is a hand waver, but I honestly cannot understand how qualia emerge fro
On 10/11/2013 9:44 PM, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
Sometimes, Bruno, I get the feeling as though you are a chef at a restaurant with a
wonderful menu, but whenever anyone orders an item on it, all you can do is give them
exactly the same picture of the item they ordered from the menu, but never the
On Friday, October 11, 2013 2:58:13 AM UTC-4, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
>
> The vocable "I" becomes attached to each impulse that arises in a psychic
> complex, no matter how mutually contradictory such impulses may appear to
> be. From this process springs the idea of a multitude of "me"'s.
>
On Friday, October 11, 2013 5:18:44 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 11 Oct 2013, at 08:58, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
>
> The vocable "I" becomes attached to each impulse that arises in a psychic
> complex, no matter how mutually contradictory such impulses may appear to
> be. From this p
Hey Craig, thanks for the feedback. Please refer to below:
On Friday, October 11, 2013 5:10:39 AM UTC-4, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, October 11, 2013 2:58:13 AM UTC-4, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
>>
>> The vocable "I" becomes attached to each impulse that arises in a psychic
>> complex,
On 11 Oct 2013, at 08:58, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
The vocable "I" becomes attached to each impulse that arises in a
psychic complex, no matter how mutually contradictory such impulses
may appear to be. From this process springs the idea of a multitude
of "me"'s.
The impulses in question
On Friday, October 11, 2013 2:58:13 AM UTC-4, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
>
> The vocable "I" becomes attached to each impulse that arises in a psychic
> complex, no matter how mutually contradictory such impulses may appear to
> be. From this process springs the idea of a multitude of "me"'s.
>
The vocable "I" becomes attached to each impulse that arises in a psychic
complex, no matter how mutually contradictory such impulses may appear to
be. From this process springs the idea of a multitude of "me"'s.
The impulses in question are affective, so that the inferential "I" is
affective
23 matches
Mail list logo
