Lee Corbin writes:
[quoting Bruno Marchal]
Why not choose D, that is I will see 0 on the wall OR I will see 1
on the wall.
Okay, now you have switched back to the prior (prediction)
level.
Here is the reason not to say that. As the person who is about
to be duplicated knows all the facts,
Le 08-juil.-05, à 00:59, Lee Corbin a écrit :
Bruno writes
Each Lee-i is offered 5$ each time his bet is confirmed, but
loses 5$ if he makes a wrong bet.
And yes, it would be possible to emphasize to each instance that
he is to attempt to maximize his own instance's earnings.
Quite
Bruno writes
You are asked to bet on your immediate and less immediate
future feeling. Precisely: we ask you to choose among the
following bets:
Immediate:
A. I will see 0 on the wall.
B. I will see 1 on the wall.
C. I will see 0 on the wall and I will see 1 on the wall.
D. I
Le 06-juil.-05, à 02:44, Lee Corbin a écrit :
Bruno wrote about whether or not we are all the same person.
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 1:59 AM
Subject: Re: What does ought mean? (was RE: Duplicates Are Selves)
I have changed the subject line once again, because this is
no longer about
Bruno writes
Each Lee-i is offered 5$ each time his bet is confirmed, but
loses 5$ if he makes a wrong bet.
And yes, it would be possible to emphasize to each instance that
he is to attempt to maximize his own instance's earnings.
Quite correct.
What will be your strategy in each
Bruno wrote about whether or not we are all the same person.
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 1:59 AM
Subject: Re: What does ought mean? (was RE: Duplicates Are Selves)
I have changed the subject line once again, because this is
no longer about what ought ought to mean.
Le 04-juil.-05, à 22:18,
6 matches
Mail list logo
