On 20 Jan 2013, at 18:53, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 19 Jan 2013, at 13:42, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 17 Jan 2013, at 16:01, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 19 Jan 2013, at 13:42, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Jan 2013, at 16:01, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Bruno
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 19 Jan 2013, at 13:42, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 17 Jan
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 20 Jan 2013, at 18:53, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 19 Jan 2013, at 13:42, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Jan 2013, at 16:01, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On 21 Jan 2013, at 14:58, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 20 Jan 2013, at 18:53, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 19 Jan 2013, at 13:42, Telmo Menezes wrote:
snip
Ok. That mode of reasoning is weirdly appealing to me. Even
On 19 Jan 2013, at 13:42, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 17 Jan 2013, at 16:01, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 17 Jan 2013, at 13:32, Telmo Menezes
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 19 Jan 2013, at 13:42, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Jan 2013, at 16:01, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Bruno
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Jan 2013, at 16:01, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Jan 2013, at 13:32, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi all,
Naive question...
Not being a
On 17 Jan 2013, at 20:08, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/17/2013 4:32 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi all,
Naive question...
Not being a physicists, I only have a pop-science level of
understanding of the MWI. I imagine the multi-verse as a tree,
where each time there is more than one possible
Hi all,
Naive question...
Not being a physicists, I only have a pop-science level of understanding of
the MWI. I imagine the multi-verse as a tree, where each time there is more
than one possible quantum state we get a branch. I imagine my consciousness
moving down the tree.
Suppose Mary
On 17 Jan 2013, at 13:32, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi all,
Naive question...
Not being a physicists, I only have a pop-science level of
understanding of the MWI. I imagine the multi-verse as a tree, where
each time there is more than one possible quantum state we get a
branch. I imagine my
2013/1/17 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 17 Jan 2013, at 13:32, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi all,
Naive question...
Not being a physicists, I only have a pop-science level of understanding
of the MWI. I imagine the multi-verse as a tree, where each time there is
more than one possible
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Jan 2013, at 13:32, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi all,
Naive question...
Not being a physicists, I only have a pop-science level of understanding
of the MWI. I imagine the multi-verse as a tree, where each time
On 17 Jan 2013, at 16:01, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 17 Jan 2013, at 13:32, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi all,
Naive question...
Not being a physicists, I only have a pop-science level of
understanding of the MWI. I
On 1/17/2013 4:32 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi all,
Naive question...
Not being a physicists, I only have a pop-science level of understanding of the MWI. I
imagine the multi-verse as a tree, where each time there is more than one possible
quantum state we get a branch. I imagine my
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:08 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
The short answer is yes. But it's not four universes, it's one universe
that is a superposition of four states. The idealization is that the cats
are isolated so that it is only when a live/dead measurement is made the
16 matches
Mail list logo
