Wei writes:
If you think about it more, I think you'll realize that the greater number
of observer-moments observing flying rabbits or similar happenings can't
make up for the much smaller measure of each such observer-moment.
Unfortunately right now I can't find a way to easily articulate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wei writes:
If by flying-rabbit you mean any deviation from simplicity, then I agree
with you. Notice that our own universe is full of quantum randomness, but
we don't see any pattern to the randomness. Similarly, an observer in a
Conway's life universe may
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wei writes, quoting Hal
In general, one might expect those minds with less observational power
and less specific knowledge and understanding of the universe to have
larger measure.
Yes, but that doesn't mean you should be surprised if you find yourself
Wei writes, quoting Hal
In general, one might expect those minds with less observational power
and less specific knowledge and understanding of the universe to have
larger measure.
Yes, but that doesn't mean you should be surprised if you find yourself
having more observational power and
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:57:16PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, suppose he took a drug which made his mental processes
become confused. He was no longer sure of basic facts about himself
and the universe. This mental state would no longer be bound to one
specific universe.
Russel wrote:
Saibal Mitra wrote:
Hal wrote:
One of the concepts we have explored is that all universes and hence
all minds exist, but that some observer-moments have greater measure
than others. This may help to explain why we observe the kind of
universe
that we do,
6 matches
Mail list logo
