On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> >>
>> Everett says observation is not what causes a universe to split it's
>> simply a change, a change made in anything will make it happen and it
>> doesn't matter if it's a observation or not.
>> For Everett the universe splits wh
On 06 Nov 2015, at 22:00, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
>> Many-Worlds gives the best explanation for why
probabilities and not certainties exist at the quantum level that I
know of, and that and the fact that it doesn't need to define
"c
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> >>
>> Many-Worlds gives the best explanation for why probabilities and not
>> certainties exist at the quantum level that I know of, and that and the
>> fact that it doesn't need to define "consciousness" or "observation" is why
>> I lik
On 04 Nov 2015, at 19:41, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
>> We know from Gleason's theorem that in 3 spatial
dimensions only the square of Schrodinger's wave (the Born rule),
and not the cube or anything else, can yield a probability without
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> >>
>> We know from Gleason's theorem
>> that in 3 spatial dimensions only the square of Schrodinger's wave (the
>> Born rule), and not the cube or anything else, can yield a probability
>> without inconsistencies; so the real questio
On 06 Oct 2015, at 00:00, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> No, it does make Einstein wrong because Einstein
detested non locality even more than he hated non determinism.
> But the experience here does not show the existence of
physical non-locality, i
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >>
>> No, it does make Einstein wrong because Einstein detested non locality
>> even more than he hated non determinism.
>>
> >
> But the experience here does not show the existence of physical
> non-locality, it only shows the way we are ent
On 02 Oct 2015, at 21:58, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05949v1
> But of course, this does not make Einstein wrong. This shows
local non locality, so to speak,
No, it does make Einstein wrong because Einstein det
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Telmo Menezes
wrote:
>> >>
>> From a philosophical point of view the universal wave equation is of no
>> more importance than lines of latitude and longitude, only the square of
>> the absolute value is of any importance and even then it is only a
>> probabil
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 9:58 PM, John Clark wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05949v1
>>
>> >
>> But of course, this does not make Einstein wrong. This shows local non
>> locality, so to speak,
>>
>
> No, it does make Einstein wro
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05949v1
>
> >
> But of course, this does not make Einstein wrong. This shows local non
> locality, so to speak,
>
No, it does make Einstein wrong because Einstein detested
non locality
even more than he hated n
In the Netherlands.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05949v1
But of course, this does not make Einstein wrong. This shows local non
locality, so to speak, from a many histories point of view. The
multiverse, or the solution of some universal wave equation describes
a deterministic local evolution
12 matches
Mail list logo
