On 07/12/2008, at 4:29 PM, Brent Meeker wrote:
(The Court Jester wrote):
What you cannot say is what is determining the order
in
the chaos once it arrives. That's closer to what I mean.
2 men start to dig a hole. They are instructed to make it reach a
depth of 5 feet. One of them
On 06/12/2008, at 6:18 PM, A. Wolf wrote:
I guess what I am on about is a bit closer to the 80s idea of chaos
- something that is inherently unpredictable; at least if you adopt
the stance of always launching your prediction from a single
present -
the one you happen to find yourself
Kim Jones wrote:
On 06/12/2008, at 6:18 PM, A. Wolf wrote:
I guess what I am on about is a bit closer to the 80s idea of chaos
- something that is inherently unpredictable; at least if you adopt
the stance of always launching your prediction from a single
present -
the one you happen
On 07/12/2008, at 3:00 AM, Brent Meeker wrote:
Kim Jones wrote:
On 06/12/2008, at 6:18 PM, A. Wolf wrote:
I guess what I am on about is a bit closer to the 80s idea of
chaos
- something that is inherently unpredictable; at least if you adopt
the stance of always launching your
Kim Jones wrote:
On 07/12/2008, at 3:00 AM, Brent Meeker wrote:
Kim Jones wrote:
On 06/12/2008, at 6:18 PM, A. Wolf wrote:
I guess what I am on about is a bit closer to the 80s idea of
chaos
- something that is inherently unpredictable; at least if you adopt
the
Notes from the Court Jester:
Math can describe the universe as it is - our most powerful mental
ability; no question about it
You have to be right at every step of the way when you use math -
inconsistency points to a lack of logical connection between steps and
is tantamount to error
Can mathematics describe an EVOLVING universe as accurately as it can
describe a static one? Newton's laws and Einstein's relativity and all
the subtle variants on these help to do so. Bruno's comp hyp seems to
address an 'eternal' if not somewhat static reality that might even be
taken as
On 06/12/2008, at 12:59 PM, A. Wolf wrote:
Can mathematics describe an EVOLVING universe as accurately as it can
describe a static one? Newton's laws and Einstein's relativity and
all
the subtle variants on these help to do so. Bruno's comp hyp seems to
address an 'eternal' if not
I guess what I am on about is a bit closer to the 80s idea of chaos
- something that is inherently unpredictable; at least if you adopt
the stance of always launching your prediction from a single present -
the one you happen to find yourself in.
I think you mean randomness, not chaos.
9 matches
Mail list logo
