On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 6:33:44 AM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 5:42 AM Philip Thrift > wrote:
>
> *> This was a pretty pointless article. Aaronson says nothing about what
>> is potentially useful for QCs*
>>
>
> Aaronson: "*One major milestone to watch for next
On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 12:32:26 AM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, November 1, 2019 at 3:25:21 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>>
>> Quantum Computer expert Scott Aaronson wrote a editorial in the October
>> 30 2019 New York Times:
>&g
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 5:42 AM Philip Thrift wrote:
*> This was a pretty pointless article. Aaronson says nothing about what is
> potentially useful for QCs*
>
Aaronson: "*One major milestone to watch for next will be the first use of
small quantum computers to simulate the quantum physics of c
On Friday, November 1, 2019 at 4:25:21 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
>
> Quantum Computer expert Scott Aaronson wrote a editorial in the October
> 30 2019 New York Times:
>
> Why Google’s Quantum Supremacy Milestone Matters
> <https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/30/opinion/google
On Friday, November 1, 2019 at 3:25:21 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>
> Quantum Computer expert Scott Aaronson wrote a editorial in the October
> 30 2019 New York Times:
>
> Why Google’s Quantum Supremacy Milestone Matters
> <https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/30/opinion/go
Quantum Computer expert Scott Aaronson wrote a editorial in the October 30
2019 New York Times:
Why Google’s Quantum Supremacy Milestone Matters
<https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/30/opinion/google-quantum-computer-sycamore.html>
* Why Google’s Quantum Supremacy Milestone Matters*
*
6 matches
Mail list logo
