On 28 Jan 2015, at 19:43, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Note that a theory which would requires nature to exploit infinite
precision would entail the falsity of computationalism.
Yes, and if the theory was correct it would also prove that the Real
Number
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Note that a theory which would requires nature to exploit infinite
> precision would entail the falsity of computationalism.
>
Yes, and if the theory was correct it would also prove that the Real
Numbers are really real.
John K Clark
--
You recei
On 28 Jan 2015, at 10:55, LizR wrote:
I must admit I am a little suspicious of a theory that requires
nature to exhibit infinite precision.
Note that a theory which would requires nature to exploit infinite
precision would entail the falsity of computationalism.
The apparent existence of
I must admit I am a little suspicious of a theory that requires nature to
exhibit infinite precision.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everythi
Tronnies may explain the need for π’s precission.
Coulomb’s Law requires that all charged particles be point particles or made
from point particles. Tronnies are point particles with a charge of plus e or
minus e. Their charge of e means the tronnies are the source of the Coulomb
force whi
5 matches
Mail list logo
