Dear Kim,
On 26 Mar 2009, at 11:33, Kim Jones wrote:
>
>
> Dear Bruno
>
> (Here I am putting on the hat of the sensei)
>
>
> I hope you are wrong on this. Usually I hope you are right on
> everything, because you usually have the "ring of truth" about you.
> Here, unfortunately I feel in my
Kim,
Indeed I raised my voice against *labeling* and doing so exclusively *in a
certain direction of a personalized (societal? cultural?) view.* And what
did I get as a scolding cold shower? *another 'labeling'*: * called: *
*VALUES*. They, too, can be 'good or bad' in the restricted views we accep
On 20/03/2009, at 6:37 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Hi Kim,
>
>
> On 19 Mar 2009, at 05:19, Kim Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> But who can say that creativity cannot be taught when no institution
>> sets out to do so?
>
>
> I have been teacher in a "modern school" based on creative thinking,
> but
On 26/03/2009, at 4:03 AM, Brent Meeker wrote:
>>
> Actually, Madoff was just skillful - not creative. Ponzi was
> creative.
>
> Brent
>
Touché
Kim
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything
Kim Jones wrote:
> On 23/03/2009, at 1:56 AM, John Mikes wrote:
>
>
>> Russell,
>> you are not alone as the target of this remark...
>>
>> Many people consider 'creativity' (like "change", "quality" etc.) a
>> POSITIVE concept. - WRONG. -
>> Just consider the recent creative financial genius
On 23/03/2009, at 1:56 AM, John Mikes wrote:
> Russell,
> you are not alone as the target of this remark...
>
> Many people consider 'creativity' (like "change", "quality" etc.) a
> POSITIVE concept. - WRONG. -
> Just consider the recent creative financial genius Maddoff, with his
> b$50 sc
6 matches
Mail list logo
