ions. You might, but
are not obliged, to present yourself, mister or miss digital physics.
Bruno Marchal
(*) http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHALAbstract.html
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal
From: marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: fi
hallucinations?
From: marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: first person indeterminacy vs predictability
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 18:19:33 +0100
On 07 Mar 2011, at 17:26, Digital Physics wrote:
I agree that white rabbits have programs much shorter than those of random
On 07 Mar 2011, at 17:26, Digital Physics wrote:
I agree that white rabbits have programs much shorter than those
of random structures.
It depends. Very short programs can generate all random structures.
You mean the short program that computes the entire set! But this is
irrelevant he
> > I agree that white rabbits have programs much shorter than those of random
> > structures.
> It depends. Very short programs can generate all random structures.
You mean the short program that computes the entire set! But this is irrelevant
here: to predict a concrete individual history, w
comp would imply
white noise and would fall immediately in Russell's Occam catastrophe.
But, thanks to God, universal numbers does not put only mess in
Platonia, they generate also a lot of order.
-- Bruno Marchal
From: marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subjec
From: marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: first person indeterminacy vs predictability
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:58:15 +0100
On 07 Mar 2011, at 10:47, Digital Physics wrote:But if most histories are
equally likely, and most of them are random and unpredictable and weird
On 07 Mar 2011, at 10:47, Digital Physics wrote:
But if most histories are equally likely, and most of them are
random and unpredictable
and weird in the sense that suddenly crocodiles fly by, then why can
we predict rather
reliably that none of those weird histories will happen?
> From: m
But if most histories are equally likely, and most of them are random and
unpredictable
and weird in the sense that suddenly crocodiles fly by, then why can we predict
rather
reliably that none of those weird histories will happen?
> From: marc...@ulb.ac.be
> To: everything-list@googlegroups.c
8 matches
Mail list logo
