I have a few comments. Overall things are coming along great!
First: bug 10925. This should be easy to fix and not fixing it could
result in people believing that Evolution has trashed their mail.
Second: Somewhere along the line Search->show all became search->clear.
I personally thought "sho
The message counter is now working!!! http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=9947
I would like to thank notzed for killing this bug.
Regards,
--
Mike Leckey, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 602.231.1685
Honeywell Engines & Systems Phoenix, AZ
PGP signature
This has been happening to me since Monday.
evolution-shell-WARNING **: Cannot activate Evolution component --
OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Addressbook_ShellComponent
evolution-shell-WARNING **: Could not start up component for
OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Mail_ShellComponent.
evolution-shell-WARNING **: C
I'm seeing something similar on both my RH7.1 boxes. If I shut down Evo,
and then go to open it again, it sys "can't find database componets" and
quits. At this point I have to do a "killev" and then kill all instances
of oaf to get it to start back up. Its been like this for a week.
DCM
On Fri
Hi,
What determines which identity gets put in the From: field when replying
to a message? I notice that sometimes it's not my default account id.
Right now it looks like any reply (reply, reply to all, reply to list)
picks a different ID in my account list rather than the default when I'm
replyi
On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 22:45, Mike Leckey, Jr. wrote:
> The message counter is now working!!!
> http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=9947
Someone might want to close my bug report, since I'm happy as well. It
never got noted as a duplicate.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=9404
>
On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 10:29, Mike Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 22:45, Mike Leckey, Jr. wrote:
> > The message counter is now working!!!
> > http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=9947
>
> Someone might want to close my bug report, since I'm happy as well. It
> never got noted as a du
On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 17:20, John Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What determines which identity gets put in the From: field when replying
> to a message? I notice that sometimes it's not my default account id.
> Right now it looks like any reply (reply, reply to all, reply to list)
> picks a different ID
hello.
i'm trying to run 2 copies of evolution on 1 machine (1 copy under
my userid and another copy (going to the same X display) from another
userid). when i start evolution from userid #2 (the user who doesn't
own the X session) executive-summary crashes right after the splash
screen. is th
On Thu, 2001-10-18 at 23:51, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> Hello, translators and hackers alike,
>
> this is just to announce that all of the Evolution user-visible strings
> will be frozen by Monday October 21st 12:00pm UTC. This includes all
> the strings in the Evolution, GtkHTML and GAL packages
On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 12:07, Rebecca J. Walter wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 17:20, John Weber wrote:
> > What determines which identity gets put in the From: field when replying
> > to a message? I notice that sometimes it's not my default account id.
>
> What I have noticed is that is appears
Is there a way to do this? When I attach use a Vcard as my signature, it gets sent in-line in the raw format instead of an attachment.
Thanks,
Ujwal
> Second: Somewhere along the line Search->show all became search->clear.
> I personally thought "show all" was a particularly clear lable and that
> it isn't clear exactly what "clear" would do.
I noticed this change too, and agree with Ben.
Jason.
--
Academic Computing Support Specialist
10/19/2001 11:41:55 AM, Jason Tackaberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Second: Somewhere along the line Search->show all became search->clear.
>> I personally thought "show all" was a particularly clear lable and that
>> it isn't clear exactly what "clear" would do.
>
>I noticed this change too,
On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 20:41, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> > Second: Somewhere along the line Search->show all became search->clear.
> > I personally thought "show all" was a particularly clear lable and that
> > it isn't clear exactly what "clear" would do.
>
> I noticed this change too, and agree
On Thu, 2001-10-18 at 07:52, Janus Christensen wrote:
> On Thu, 2001-10-18 at 07:10, Jürgen Meurer wrote:
>
> > Whats about your timezone settings in linux ?
> > Are they right ?
>
> As Damon requested I ran 'date' and 'date -u' and got:
>
> $ date
> Thu Oct 18 10:44:14 GMT+1 2001
> $
OK. This info helps me narrow down the behavior I think is strange. If I
reply to a message where the To: field is one of my identities in the
mail settings, then the From: will match that. What I notice is that if
I'm replying and the To: is not one of my identities (e.g. the To: field
is this ma
On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 21:14, Eric Lambart wrote:
> 10/19/2001 11:41:55 AM, Jason Tackaberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Second: Somewhere along the line Search->show all became search->clear.
> >> I personally thought "show all" was a particularly clear lable and that
> >> it isn't clear e
It just turns on or off receiving mail for that account.
Jeff
On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 19:52, John Weber wrote:
> OK. This info helps me narrow down the behavior I think is strange. If I
> reply to a message where the To: field is one of my identities in the
> mail settings, then the From: will mat
Is it my imagination, or is there a bug in gtkhtml? Or is it in the
preview function itself?
I just upgraded RPMwise to the 10.18.15.19 version of 16.99, and I am
getting some overlap on text, I think only on email addresses in the
body of the text. Am I the only one?
By the way,
There have been changes in that code lately; if you could screenshot it
so we can see exactly what the problem is it might help clarify what the
problem is.
Luis
On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 23:36, Chris Holly wrote:
> Is it my imagination, or is there a bug in gtkhtml? Or is it in the
> preview functi
Evolution has been severely broken for me since last weekend (I'm sending
this from Spruce). I updated from CVS tonight, did a killev, oaf-slay,
kill gconfd, and it still goes into 100% CPU mode in
evolution-executive-summary. So I rebooted, and Evolution came up. So I
thought I'd move my evolu
To add to this, I still can't switch to Calendar or Tasks. As soon as I
click on the folder, that component goes into 100% CPU and I have to do
a killev. It wouldn't surprise me if all of this breakage is due to the
same problem (in gtkhtml?). Let me know what I need to do to help track
this do
Hmm. You must be using anoncvs, because the bugs you mention
have all been fixed in the main CVS tree. Also, I believe that
the latest Snapshot release has fixes for these problems.
If you can try the latest snapshot, I think you might have
better results. Unfortunately, it sounds like the ano
On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 01:36, Tayfun Can wrote:
> Does Evolution support S/MIME? If not, any future plans?
It does not in 1.0. It will be supported in 1.1.
-- Dan
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evo
Dan actually worked out why, I just managed to recreate it and ask
the right annoying questions!
> The message counter is now working!!!
> http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D9947
>
> I would like to thank notzed for killing this bug.=20
__
Sounds clear as mud.
(sorry, someone had to do it)
>
> On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 20:41, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> > > Second: Somewhere along the line Search->show all became search->clear.
> > > I personally thought "show all" was a particularly clear lable and that
> > > it isn't clear exactly
On Wed, 2001-10-17 at 18:32, NotZed wrote:
> Once we can recreate it it'll probably be an easy fix.
YES! Yes!
It's working! Thank you!
Haven't done massive testing though, but it looks really good so far!
/Mikael - running 0.16.99+cvs.2001.10.18.15.21
--
---
On Wed, 2001-10-17 at 18:32, NotZed wrote:
> Once we can recreate it it'll probably be an easy fix.
Umm.. Just one thing. Now it reports 318 unread mail in my Sent-box (Not
on the IMAP-server, but the local one). But they are all "read"..
I don't know if this is related to the IMAP thing at al
Trash folders? Not sure you can unsubscribe the trash folder.
Anyway there were problems with unsubscribe/resubscribe that
I just fixed, though i'm not sure they'd manifest that way.
>
> Yeah! I think there is a problem with unsubscribe. This morning I
> unsubscribe a lot of my trash folders
30 matches
Mail list logo
