> I mean there are those who believe that no one should send HTML email or
> email with very large attachments, yet both of those are allowed.
> Reasonable defaults are a good thing.
I totally agree.
Besides, regarding the first answer (message stripped off after '--' is detected), the
Hi,
I use the 'leave messages on server' option in Evo with my POP server, and I'd like to know if it is possible to configure Evo so that it tells the POP server to erase the messages once they have been locally deleted.
Thanks for your kind help,
Alex
Same here (no experience). This looks useful -
http://www.gtk.org/tutorial/
Without having looked at the source all I can reckon is that the form
fields are mostly disabled on account of the callbacks hadn't been put
in, or in otherwords the form doesn't actually work. There's a good
change the f
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 21:51, Jonathan F. Dill wrote:
> What Linux kernels are involved? Are all of the Linux updates applied?
> Have you tried fs benchmark like "bonnie" to see how fs access to the
> NFS server is in general independent of evolution?
I'm running 2.4.9 on all of the machines inv
Hah! I did try that on the hopes that the flag would actually be set on
outgoing, but it did not. :(
Good idea though.
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 22:13, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> Am Fre, 2002-05-31 um 01.08 schrieb Austin Gonyou:
> > Please, does anyone know if this can be done or not?
> >
> > On
No, this is not currently possible.
Jeff
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 04:42, Alexandre Aractingi wrote:
> Hi,
> I use the 'leave messages on server' option in Evo with my POP
> server, and I'd like to know if it is possible to configure Evo so
> that it tells the POP server to erase the messages once
Thing is, the form works fine over here when editing a local contact.
The back end is there, it's just being disabled for some reason when
editing an LDAP based contact. My guess is that the LDAP module in
Evolution thinks that it doesn't have permission to edit (for some
reason), and thus it
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 08:16, Mark Foster wrote:
> Been seeing this for quite awhile now. I thought it must be a unfinished
> feature set or a misconfiguration of the ACL on my OpenLDAP server. Now
> I think not. I have had some luck editing and creating new (LDAP-based)
> contacts by either creati
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 12:07, Paul Legato wrote:
>
> Thing is, the form works fine over here when editing a local contact.
> The back end is there, it's just being disabled for some reason when
> editing an LDAP based contact. My guess is that the LDAP module in
> Evolution thinks that it doesn
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the information. My delete button is enabled in the popup
editor, indicating that Evolution thinks I have permission, and the
delete button does in fact actually delete the associated record from
the LDAP server.
I've got core.schema, cosine.schema, and inetorgperson.sch
10 matches
Mail list logo
