Re: [Evolution] Filtering for one folder?

On Mit, 2002-08-21 at 17:43, Peter Williams wrote: > > As I said, I do server-side filtering. Nothing wrong with that, I would > > think... Actually, there's a language for it called Sieve (RFC 3028 or > > http://www.cyrusoft.com/sieve/index.html), which may be a fine thing to > > support. I thin

Re: [Evolution] Filtering for one folder?

On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 03:29, Oliver Sturm wrote: > On Mit, 2002-08-21 at 17:43, Peter Williams wrote: > > > > As I said, I do server-side filtering. Nothing wrong with that, I would > > > think... Actually, there's a language for it called Sieve (RFC 3028 or > > > http://www.cyrusoft.com/sieve/in

Re: [Evolution] Filtering for one folder?

On Don, 2002-08-22 at 09:34, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > Well, I don't understand that. I'd implement such a feature so that a > > filter is only looked at if it's active for a specific folder. I mean, > > under the assumption that all mail arrives in INBOX, you currently run > > each filter for

Re: [Evolution] regex on attachments?

On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 17:19, Not Zed wrote: > > now i think about it, i'm not sure this will work, because the headers > checked are only the toplevel ones. And a body regex only does > (textual) body content. Does that mean it's impossible for now? Or are there other possibilities? Thanks --

Re: [Evolution] Filtering for one folder?

Oliver Sturm said: > I'd think Exchange users would say the same, wouldn't they? I don't know > much about Exchange, but I'm sure it has server-side filtering, doesn't > it? Yes, it does. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project