Because we don't support namespaces.
Jeff
On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 18:59, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Why does evolution 1.08 not allow me to create a #shared/ folder talking
> to a UW Server?
>
>
> --
> Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
> Phone: +1 972-414-9812
Hey all,
Would it be possible to have a more verbose status bar when it comes to
receiving mail from an IMAP server?
Right now, when I click on 'Send/Receive', a window pops up with an
empty 'bar' (see attached picture) and the status bar at the bottom of
the main screen states "Scanning folders
Hallo people,
Quiestion from a Unix sysadmin (Exim 4 smtp).
I have Evo 1.0.8 for a private setup with Exim 4. I use RH rpms and
don't want to compile endless Evo CVS updates - I've better things to
do.
As Exim mail/sysadmin I'd like Evo to do EHLO, STARTTLS, AUTH (PLAIN,
CRAM_MD5, SPA).
O.k.,
Hello
i need to change the port in order to receive my mail
in the pop configuration (from 110 to 1110 i think).
How do i do?
Tnanks in advance
LP
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 13:07, lapeg wrote:
> Hello
>
> i need to change the port in order to receive my mail
> in the pop configuration (from 110 to 1110 i think).
> How do i do?
>
when you enter the hostname, just use host:port there.
cheers
--
Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 12:59 skrev Tony Earnshaw:
> I have Evo 1.0.8 for a private setup with Exim 4. I use RH rpms and
> don't want to compile endless Evo CVS updates - I've better things to
> do.
P.S.: I don't use rpms for Exim 4.10.8 :c) That's not only impossible,
because none exist, but also a
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 02:35, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> Because we don't support namespaces.
Will 1.2 support namespaces?
If so, when is 1.2 supposed to be released? (I'm on FreeBSD, so getting
the CVS version to work is a problem).
Thanks,
LER
>
> Jeff
>
> On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 18:59, Larr
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 08:45, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 02:35, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > Because we don't support namespaces.
> Will 1.2 support namespaces?
No, nor will 1.4 (most likely). You'll have to wait until NotZed and/or
I get a chance to completely rewrite the IMAP
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 13:08, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 08:45, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 02:35, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > Because we don't support namespaces.
> > Will 1.2 support namespaces?
>
> No, nor will 1.4 (most likely). You'll have to wait u
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 14:25, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 13:08, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 08:45, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 02:35, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > > Because we don't support namespaces.
> > > Will 1.2 support namespaces
Hey everyone,
I'm having some troubles with getting my filters in 1.08 to mark a
message as Read
I currently have about 12 filters that simply move messages to the
appropriate folder. I'm now trying to get that same filter to mark
messages as Read after it's been moved to the right folder.
Ob
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 06:59, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> Hallo people,
>
> Quiestion from a Unix sysadmin (Exim 4 smtp).
>
> I have Evo 1.0.8 for a private setup with Exim 4. I use RH rpms and
> don't want to compile endless Evo CVS updates - I've better things to
> do.
>
> As Exim mail/sysadmin I'd
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 14:36, Dennis Rasey wrote:
[snip]
>
> Obviously I'm doing something stupid.my 2nd "action" on my filter is
> simply "Set Status Read".
> Unfortunetaly, it doesn't work
you want your first action to be "Mark As Read" and the second action to
be the Move.
Think o
søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 20:53 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast:
> Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms:
> CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM)
Some might say that a number of these, if not all, are not SASL. Others
might say, that they find you have a great produc
>>Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms:
>>CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM)
>Some might say that a number of these, if not all, are not SASL. Others
>might say, that they find you have a great product anyway and know what
>you mean. They might also s
> GSSAPI is what provides Kerberos V, yes?
Yes
> I've asked about this on the list a couple of times. I've seen other
> people ask about it.
Yeah, it's not that no one's asked about it, it's that
1. GSSAPI is about 10 times more complicated than Kerberos 4, and
2. We've never had a k
At the risk of sounding like an Outlook advocate - I AM **NOT!** -
I wonder if there is any way to get a filter to forward a message after
other operations such as moving and colorizing?
/a
--
It is against the grain of modern education to teach children to program.
What fun is there in making p
A few days ago i wanted a filter that could check RBL's and spamcop
etc... Not Zed at ximian said:
Quote
=
1.2 lets you run an external script which accepts the message on
stdinput and returns a return code which can be used to s
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 17:31, Anton Aylward wrote:
> At the risk of sounding like an Outlook advocate - I AM **NOT!** -
> I wonder if there is any way to get a filter to forward a message after
> other operations such as moving and colorizing?
Not yet - it is in the TODO list though.
Jeff
--
Je
Hi all
Does Evolution support POP3S, IMAPS or SMTPS (POP3, IMAP or SMTP over
SSL)?
What options would have to be set upon configuration (for compile) to
enable these features?
Best
Diego
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.x
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 22:08, Diego Rivera wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Does Evolution support POP3S, IMAPS or SMTPS (POP3, IMAP or SMTP over
> SSL)?
yes, all 3 in fact.
>
> What options would have to be set upon configuration (for compile) to
> enable these features?
./configure --with-nspr-includes=
hmm, letm e guess the problem ...
folders cvant create a slash? :)
actually, u can only create a subfoplder of an existing folder or path.
the imap code only supports a single namespace at the moment, which is
the basic r3eason this wont work
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 12:43, Larry Rosenman wrote:
you can colourise individual messages only. or you can do 'select
thread', then 'label mesages' (in 1.2). but not automatic.
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 06:42, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
> Can Evo colorize threads, or is this in the works for future Evos? I'd
> like that feature, if it isn't planned.
>
of course any colourising will be lost in the forwarded copy ..
(whenever forarding is impolemented)
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 11:17, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 17:31, Anton Aylward wrote:
> > At the risk of sounding like an Outlook advocate - I AM **NOT!** -
> > I wonder if ther
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 05:56, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 20:53 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast:
>
> > Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms:
>
> > CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM)
>
> Some might say that a number of these, if not all, are no
yeah its possible. the guy that wrote imap never put it in, and most
ppl get their mail in the background so dont notice/care too much
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 19:10, Michael-John Anthony wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Would it be possible to have a more verbose status bar when it comes to
> receiving mail
søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 15:32 skrev Not Zed:
> > > Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms:
> > > CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM)
> > Some might say that a number of these, if not all, are not SASL.
> why?
Because SASL (Simple Authentication and Secur
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 01:45, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 15:32 skrev Not Zed:
>
> > > > Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms:
> > > > CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM)
>
> > > Some might say that a number of these, if not all, are no
see:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/sasl-mechanisms
:)
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 15:15, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 15:32 skrev Not Zed:
>
> > > > Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms:
> > > > CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM)
>
> >
29 matches
Mail list logo
