On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 05:04, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12-Sep-2002/23:03 +0930, Not Zed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >i'm not saying it couldn't also be addressed at the evolution level
> >either, but it might be easier to fix outside of evo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12-Sep-2002/23:03 +0930, Not Zed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>i'm not saying it couldn't also be addressed at the evolution level
>either, but it might be easier to fix outside of evo, as it will affect
>all applictions anyway.
I think he's talking
On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 05:46, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
> Got two issues/questions on accepting meetings in Evolution (from
> Outlook 2000, but I don't know if it's application specific or just an
> Evolution oddity), and one Evolution calendar question.
>
> Issue 1: Time
> When I receive a meeting
Le jeu 12/09/2002 à 14:37, Not Zed a écrit :
> this belongs on the evolution users list.
>
> depends on what sort of crash u had, but sure it sounds non ideal.
>
> On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 10:33, Francisco Javier Fernandez wrote:
> > I 'm runing evo 1.0.8 and due to a crash when i was configuring a
ServerSide you could tweak the TCP settings for time-outs; If you want I
can lookup a document describing this, but you will bypass every RFC on
TCP, which could cause problems with applications
Greetz
Hans
On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 08:09, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 23:40, Zot O'
Le jeu 12/09/2002 à 14:29, Not Zed a écrit :
> On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 05:23, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > 1.1.x is a lot better about this afaik. And no, Evolution never "locked"
> > on an IP address.
>
> the os will though. it will take a while to time out existing
> connections/connection attemp
