[Evolution] Hide email address in 'From' field?

2002-01-11 Thread Shiva Shankar
is it possible to hide the sender's email address in the 'From' field? i am using Evo 1.0 against M$ Exchange 2000 server ( imap ). tia shiva ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Hide email address in 'From' field?

2002-01-15 Thread Shiva Shankar
ver functionality. He says it is most likely not possible though, as > if it were spammers could take advantage... > > On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 20:07, Shiva Shankar wrote: > > is it possible to hide the sender's email address in the 'From' field? > > i am

[Evolution] Calendar error

2002-04-04 Thread Shiva Shankar
hi if i try to accept a meeting proposal sent from outlook 2000, i get the following message: "Unable to find any of your identities in the attendees list". i am running Evo 1.0.3 on Redhat 7.2. i am pretty sure this used to work in 1.0.2. thanks shiva _

[Evolution] Problem with long emails?

2002-05-13 Thread Shiva Shankar
hi i received an email with a long list of files in the body, and i couldnt see it in the preview pane. even opening the email in another window didnt help. when i tried to reply to the email though, i could see the file list. i remember reading about this on the lists some time back, and was wond

[Evolution] OT: Compose window position in Icewm

2002-05-29 Thread Shiva Shankar
hi i realize that this is off topic, but i guess some of us on this list would have faced this problem. is there anyway to configure icewm to open the compose window in the middle of the screen?by default, it opens it in the upper left corner. thanks shiva __

Re: [Evolution] Active Directory LDAP browsing using Evolution.Help if you can!

2002-06-04 Thread Shiva Shankar
that worked for me. i am able to browse the AD now. is it possible to setup address auto completion against the "Global Catalog" instead of the default ldap port? i am using Evo 10.0.5 on Redhat 7.3. thanks shiva On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 12:29, Dan Winship wrote: > (toshok: read the end at least) >