Howdy!
It appears that an poorly worded query on my part spawned an interesting
topic: how can we recognize arbitrarily quoted messages for purposes of
colorization, requoting, and rewrapping?
It feels like a potentially worthwhile approach is to spend some time
trying to recognize attribution s
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 10:15, Mark Neill wrote:
> > The nice thing about a regexp is that it can be as simple as "^>" (for
> > those that just want something simple), or as complex as
> > "^(([ ]|[A-Z])*[|>:}#])+" for those that want something more capable.
>
> This should be selectable then
> The nice thing about a regexp is that it can be as simple as "^>" (for
> those that just want something simple), or as complex as
> "^(([ ]|[A-Z])*[|>:}#])+" for those that want something more capable.
This should be selectable then - Bob Smith isn't going to understand /^>/
inserts a >
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 09:30, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
>
> No offense taken, however I don't know if I like the idea of a regex,
> our target users are not perl hackers :-)
The nice thing about a regexp is that it can be as simple as "^>" (for
those that just want something simple), or as complex a
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 11:08, Brett Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 19:55, Mike Strock wrote:
> > On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 12:25, Brett Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 11:54, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > > No, it's not possible. I suppose we could add the feature but I
> > > > perso
On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 19:55, Mike Strock wrote:
> On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 12:25, Brett Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 11:54, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > No, it's not possible. I suppose we could add the feature but I
> > > personally am not sure I like the idea. If people change the pref
On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 12:25, Brett Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 11:54, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > No, it's not possible. I suppose we could add the feature but I
> > personally am not sure I like the idea. If people change the prefix,
> > then it becomes impossible (not hard, but imposs
Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> PS. Wasn't there an internet standards draft that said quoted text
> must/should (whatever) use "> " ?
Well there is rfc2646 "The Text/Plain Format Parameter".
I cannot recall others offhand.
./borup
___
evolution maillist
On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 10:54, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
No, it's not possible. I suppose we could add the feature but I
personally am not sure I like the idea. If people change the prefix,
then it becomes impossible (not hard, but impossible) to colourize
and/or do anything cool with quoted t
Perhaps, because of some people's preferences, they would prefer that,
over pretty stuff. I like it the way it is, but again, in the OSS
spirit, "Choice is nice."
On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 12:54, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> No, it's not possible. I suppose we could add the feature but I
> personally am
On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 11:54, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> No, it's not possible. I suppose we could add the feature but I
> personally am not sure I like the idea. If people change the prefix,
> then it becomes impossible (not hard, but impossible) to colourize
> and/or do anything cool with quoted t
No, it's not possible. I suppose we could add the feature but I
personally am not sure I like the idea. If people change the prefix,
then it becomes impossible (not hard, but impossible) to colourize
and/or do anything cool with quoted text in general.
You'll notice that when you reply to a messa
Hello!
I was curious if it is possible to change the string which precedes
quoted replies. Is it? =]
--j
--
Jim Meyer, Geek At Large [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/
13 matches
Mail list logo
