On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 02:41, Not Zed wrote:
> > Yeah, I was never happy with RC. So now I only use the packages in Debian
> > unstable. I don't use RC, but I can sympathize that Ximian's practice is
> > aggravating. However, there haven't seemed to be any posts detailing why RC
> > is a requirement
> Yeah, I was never happy with RC. So now I only use the packages in Debian
> unstable. I don't use RC, but I can sympathize that Ximian's practice is
> aggravating. However, there haven't seemed to be any posts detailing why RC
> is a requirement, nor many asking for that policy to be changed. Yo
Irle Markus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 11 15, 02 at 06:20:
>
> No, not really. RC is open-source, isn't it?
> But that nit-picking is again completely missing my point.
>
> Why am I forced into RC to _download_ a package?
Because Ximian wants you to. I realize that sounds flippant, but i
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply, been off to OOPSLA last week...
-Original Message-
>From: Michael Leone [mailto:turgon@;mike-leone.com]
>Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Oktober 2002 21:45
>To: Irle Markus
>Subject: Re: [Evolution] Connector / Debian Sid - revisited
>Markus I
Hi,
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 18:23, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> tor, 2002-10-31 kl. 13:01 skrev Markus Irle:
**snip**
> > What I don't understand is the following:
> > While freedom of choice being advocated up and down the road in the
> > Linux community, I am forced to use Ximian's propriatry tool
tor, 2002-10-31 kl. 13:01 skrev Markus Irle:
> Thanks for the replies.
> I do understand that it takes time to support a distribution and that
> not-stable distributions won't be officially supported at all. I'm on my
> own there, I can live with that...
> What I don't understand is the followin
Hi,
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 15:57, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:01, Markus Irle wrote:
> > Hi,
**snip**
> > What I don't understand is the following:
> > While freedom of choice being advocated up and down the road in the
> > Linux community, I am forced to use Ximian's propriatr
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:01, Markus Irle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the replies.
> I do understand that it takes time to support a distribution and that
> not-stable distributions won't be officially supported at all. I'm on my
> own there, I can live with that...
>
> What I don't understand is
Hi,
Thanks for the replies.
I do understand that it takes time to support a distribution and that
not-stable distributions won't be officially supported at all. I'm on my
own there, I can live with that...
What I don't understand is the following:
While freedom of choice being advocated up and d
