[Evolution] Ldap, Evo and evolutionPerson.schema

2002-09-25 Thread Tony Earnshaw
Hi developers, Chris Toshok wrote 16th August last: quote The location of the schema file wasn't communicated that well even to the people that *did* use the source instead of binary snapshots. The reason being it was a hack and even when I wrote it I knew most of it would end up being

Re: [Evolution] Ldap, Evo and evolutionPerson.schema

2002-09-25 Thread Adam Williams
quote The location of the schema file wasn't communicated that well even to the people that *did* use the source instead of binary snapshots. The reason being it was a hack and even when I wrote it I knew most of it would end up being deprecated eventually (parts of it already are -- the

Re: [Evolution] Ldap, Evo and evolutionPerson.schema

2002-09-25 Thread Tony Earnshaw
ons, 2002-09-25 kl. 13:21 skrev Adam Williams: evolutionPerson is a structural class. That is probably the root of the problem. Nope. 2.1.4 would not have worked then. The complaint is about the attribute, not the objectClass, nor any objectClass conflict. I've had them with the Evo schema