I upgraded from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 and now I am suffering from a strange
problem.
When I send mail from evolution (and this has worked for years) the
first mail gets delivered allright, but it stays in the Outbox. Next
mail will not be delivered, because (as I understand it) evolution
thinks that it c
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 00:03, Not Zed wrote:
> Well what delivery errors are you getting?
>
Thats just it. I don't get any errors. The first mail is delivered fine
even though it stays in the Outbox.
> Deletion should make it ignore those messages, although you could try
> forcing an exp
This is exactly the same problem I am having. I just built Evolution
1.2.1 and I am having the same thing happen when I try to send mail via
SMTP. No error messages. The mail simply goes to my Outbox. Hopefully, we
can get some help.
:)
Rick
On 20 Dec 2002 09:43:44 +0200, "Tony Lindstrom" <[EMA
Well what delivery errors are you getting?
Deletion should make it ignore those messages, although you could try
forcing an expunge to ensure nothing is left of the deleted messages.
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 17:43, Tony Lindstrom wrote:
> I upgraded from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 and now I am suffering from
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 11:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is exactly the same problem I am having. I just built Evolution
> 1.2.1 and I am having the same thing happen when I try to send mail via
> SMTP. No error messages. The mail simply goes to my Outbox. Hopefully, we
> can get some help.
>
On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 01:21, Tony Lindstrom wrote:
> I just found out, why not everyone is suffering from this...
>
> Do you also save your "sent messages" in an imap-folder? I do (did) and
> now when I changed to use the sent-messages in the local folders the
> mail is delivered norma
On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 00:29, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 01:21, Tony Lindstrom wrote:
> > I just found out, why not everyone is suffering from this...
> >
> > Do you also save your "sent messages" in an imap-folder? I do (did) and
> > now when I changed to use the sent
On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 10:57, Eric Lambart wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 00:29, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 01:21, Tony Lindstrom wrote:
> > >
> > > Anyway this certainly is a bug. But I do not know if it was the upgrade
> > > from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 that brought this up or
