Re: [Evolution] Mark all as Read - Query.

2002-04-19 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:04:49PM -0700, Rob Walker wrote: On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 13:41, Janus Christensen wrote: On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 05:32, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: But, yeah, I guess one shouldn't be surprised if Microsoft steals the idea.

Re: [Evolution] Mark all as Read - Query.

2002-04-19 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
(sorry Anthony, I meant to reply here) On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 13:36, Anthony E. Greene wrote: In the U.S., there is a patent that can be used to allow anyone to use the idea. I seem to remember that it is something like registering a prior art with the Patent Office so that no one can try to

Re: [Evolution] Mark all as Read - Query.

2002-04-18 Thread Janus Christensen
On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 05:32, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: Yeah, for me vFolders are why evolution exists, might not be the real reason but think they are the best thing. I expect to hear of Microsoft's new innovative virtual folders for outlook any day now ;o) MS Lookout has something called

Re: [Evolution] Mark all as Read - Query.

2002-04-18 Thread Rob Walker
On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 13:41, Janus Christensen wrote: On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 05:32, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: Yeah, for me vFolders are why evolution exists, might not be the real reason but think they are the best thing. I expect to hear of Microsoft's new innovative virtual folders for

Re: [Evolution] Mark all as Read - Query.

2002-04-17 Thread Rob Brown-Bayliss
Hey, now there's some innovative thinking. I just might try that next time I'm importing mail (from pine that is). Yeah, for me vFolders are why evolution exists, might not be the real reason but think they are the best thing. I expect to hear of Microsoft's new innovative virtual folders

Re: [Evolution] Mark all as Read - Query.

2002-04-16 Thread Michael-John Anthony
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 07:41, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 22:55, Michael-John Anthony wrote: On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:51, Not Zed wrote: Ahh, if we had a scripting interface, you could do it yourself ... I wish I could. It took me about 1/2 an hour to go through all

Re: [Evolution] Mark all as Read - Query.

2002-04-15 Thread Not Zed
Ahh, if we had a scripting interface, you could do it yourself ... On Sun, 2002-04-14 at 04:15, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: No and no. What if you don't want it to reply recursively? ie, you just want it to mark all messages in the parent as unread but not in the children? I think this would be

Re: [Evolution] Mark all as Read - Query.

2002-04-15 Thread Michael-John Anthony
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:51, Not Zed wrote: Ahh, if we had a scripting interface, you could do it yourself ... I wish I could. It took me about 1/2 an hour to go through all mail folders (about 70 odd folders in total) and make them all look as if the messages contained within were all read.

Re: [Evolution] Mark all as Read - Query.

2002-04-15 Thread Not Zed
What did you import them from? Perhaps the importer has bug with it. FWIW, its possible to write a simple script to do this 'offline' anyway. On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 20:25, Michael-John Anthony wrote: On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:51, Not Zed wrote: Ahh, if we had a scripting interface, you

Re: [Evolution] Mark all as Read - Query.

2002-04-15 Thread Rob Brown-Bayliss
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 22:55, Michael-John Anthony wrote: On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:51, Not Zed wrote: Ahh, if we had a scripting interface, you could do it yourself ... I wish I could. It took me about 1/2 an hour to go through all mail folders (about 70 odd folders in total) and make them

[Evolution] Mark all as Read - Query.

2002-04-13 Thread Michael-John Anthony
Hey all, Just a query - the mark all as read feature - if I select a parent (top level) mail folder in my folders list, that contains subfolders which have unread messages, and then select Mark all as read, can this be applied to each sub folder? If not, can this be a feature of a new

Re: [Evolution] Mark all as Read - Query.

2002-04-13 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
No and no. What if you don't want it to reply recursively? ie, you just want it to mark all messages in the parent as unread but not in the children? I think this would be unintuitive. Jeff On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 10:36, Michael-John Anthony wrote: Hey all, Just a query - the mark all as read