[Evolution] New lock icon implies authentic sig

2001-10-24 Thread Mike Leckey, Jr.
I received a signed message that I did not have the key for. The small padlock was in a locked state, implying a good signature. But when I clicked on the lock for more details, a bigger unlocked/broken lock appeared, and the said "This message is digitally signed but can not be proven to be auth

Re: [Evolution] New lock icon implies authentic sig

2001-10-24 Thread Mike Leckey, Jr.
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 07:36, Dan Winship wrote: > On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 09:55, Mike Leckey, Jr. wrote: > > I received a signed message that I did not have the key for. The small > > padlock was in a locked state, implying a good signature. > > The question-mark in the icon is supposed to imply "

Re: [Evolution] New lock icon implies authentic sig

2001-10-24 Thread Jens Lautenbacher
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 18:40, Miles Lane wrote: > As Dan has pointed out, it would be better if > the new, smaller icon was made into several icons that differentiate > between validated and unvalidated signatures. You don't know this before you pressed the button. > Another consideration is tha

Re: [Evolution] New lock icon implies authentic sig

2001-10-24 Thread Miles Lane
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 10:33, Jens Lautenbacher wrote: > On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 18:40, Miles Lane wrote: > > As Dan has pointed out, it would be better if > > the new, smaller icon was made into several icons that differentiate > > between validated and unvalidated signatures. > > You don't know th

Re: [Evolution] New lock icon implies authentic sig

2001-10-24 Thread Dan Berger
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 07:33:07PM +0200, Jens Lautenbacher wrote: > On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 18:40, Miles Lane wrote: > > As Dan has pointed out, it would be better if > > the new, smaller icon was made into several icons that differentiate > > between validated and unvalidated signatures. > > You

Re: [Evolution] New lock icon implies authentic sig

2001-10-24 Thread Rick Ziegler
In that case the question mark needs to be bigger. I too was scratching my head over the new icon, and I work on an OCSP responder for a living! On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 10:36, Dan Winship wrote: > On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 09:55, Mike Leckey, Jr. wrote: > > I received a signed message that I did not h

Re: [Evolution] New lock icon implies authentic sig

2001-10-24 Thread Eric Lambart
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 07:36, Dan Winship wrote: > On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 09:55, Mike Leckey, Jr. wrote: > > I received a signed message that I did not have the key for. The small > > padlock was in a locked state, implying a good signature. > > The question-mark in the icon is supposed to imply "

Re: [Evolution] New lock icon implies authentic sig

2001-10-24 Thread Miles Lane
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 07:36, Dan Winship wrote: > On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 09:55, Mike Leckey, Jr. wrote: > > I received a signed message that I did not have the key for. The small > > padlock was in a locked state, implying a good signature. > > The question-mark in the icon is supposed to imply "