I received a signed message that I did not have the key for. The small
padlock was in a locked state, implying a good signature. But when I
clicked on the lock for more details, a bigger unlocked/broken lock
appeared, and the said "This message is digitally signed but can not be
proven to be auth
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 07:36, Dan Winship wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 09:55, Mike Leckey, Jr. wrote:
> > I received a signed message that I did not have the key for. The small
> > padlock was in a locked state, implying a good signature.
>
> The question-mark in the icon is supposed to imply "
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 18:40, Miles Lane wrote:
> As Dan has pointed out, it would be better if
> the new, smaller icon was made into several icons that differentiate
> between validated and unvalidated signatures.
You don't know this before you pressed the button.
> Another consideration is tha
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 10:33, Jens Lautenbacher wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 18:40, Miles Lane wrote:
> > As Dan has pointed out, it would be better if
> > the new, smaller icon was made into several icons that differentiate
> > between validated and unvalidated signatures.
>
> You don't know th
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 07:33:07PM +0200, Jens Lautenbacher wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 18:40, Miles Lane wrote:
> > As Dan has pointed out, it would be better if
> > the new, smaller icon was made into several icons that differentiate
> > between validated and unvalidated signatures.
>
> You
In that case the question mark needs to be bigger. I too was scratching
my head over the new icon, and I work on an OCSP responder for a living!
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 10:36, Dan Winship wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 09:55, Mike Leckey, Jr. wrote:
> > I received a signed message that I did not h
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 07:36, Dan Winship wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 09:55, Mike Leckey, Jr. wrote:
> > I received a signed message that I did not have the key for. The small
> > padlock was in a locked state, implying a good signature.
>
> The question-mark in the icon is supposed to imply "
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 07:36, Dan Winship wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 09:55, Mike Leckey, Jr. wrote:
> > I received a signed message that I did not have the key for. The small
> > padlock was in a locked state, implying a good signature.
>
> The question-mark in the icon is supposed to imply "