On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 11:49, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Then use 'p' instead of 'n' ;-)
Jeff
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 08:50, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On a related note, I normally sort upwards so newest messages are at the
top. when I move a message I've just read to a more-appropriate folder,
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 13:55, Ralph Sanford wrote:
Is it possible to sort the messages with the newest messages on top and
then be able to read upwards PLUS deleting the read messages.
The only potential keyboard shortcut I have found for this is ctrl-d;
but this only works in the downward
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 19:53, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
From what I'm inferring from reading this message, the key issue is not
to find a key that deletes and moves up or down, but that the definition
of what the previous and next message to move to (for the p and
n) or the next (for the
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 22:34, Rob Walker wrote:
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 19:53, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
So... the comment was that sorted by date follows the date field, in the
direction of the sort. If newest is at the top, then next is up not
down.
For what it's worth, I agree with
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 10:49, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Then use 'p' instead of 'n' ;-)
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 08:50, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On a related note, I normally sort upwards so newest messages are at the
top. when I move a message I've just read to a more-appropriate folder,
I'd
It's for selecting the Next or Previously unread message which is what
it sounds like you wanted to do, right?
Previous being in the up direction and Next being in the down
direction.
Jeff
On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 07:57, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 10:49, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On a related note, I normally sort upwards so newest messages are at the
top. when I move a message I've just read to a more-appropriate folder,
I'd like the selection to move to the next message in sort order, ie.
upwards, not downwards.
___
Then use 'p' instead of 'n' ;-)
Jeff
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 08:50, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On a related note, I normally sort upwards so newest messages are at the
top. when I move a message I've just read to a more-appropriate folder,
I'd like the selection to move to the next message in sort
On Sun 10 Feb 2002 at 14:03, Stephen Witkop wrote:
I think the proper behavior would be to not re-sort the message list
every time a mail is deleted or moved when viewing mails threaded. Maybe
wait until the user either changes to another view or closes and
restarts evo.
I agree.
On Sun, 2002-02-10 at 18:17, Michael Montz wrote:
On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 02:15, Jim George wrote:
Folks,
can someone help me.
I am a great fan of evolution but there are a couple of minor nags
including this one;
I am unable to open the top mail in a thread and then
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19651
Does that bug sound the same?
On Sun, 2002-02-10 at 13:57, Jim George wrote:
On Sun, 2002-02-10 at 18:17, Michael Montz wrote:
On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 02:15, Jim George wrote:
Folks,
can someone help me.
Very very similar, except that in preview pane mode. If I delete a file
in a thread the whole thread seems to move down the sort order, which
then means when I reach the end of the thread I move to a different
thread, rather than the one I expected.
Jim
On Sun, 2002-02-10 at 20:48, Lonnie
This has bothered me since threading was implemented way back. What
seems to happen when using the preview pane is that every time a mail is
deleted, the whole list is resorted so that the thread that you are
viewing is placed wherever the next mail in the thread currently sits in
the sort order.
Folks,
can someone help me.
I am a great fan of evolution but there are a couple of minor nags
including this one;
I am unable to open the top mail in a thread and then move sequentially
through that thread by either deleting the current mail or pressing 'n'
or clicking
14 matches
Mail list logo
