On tor, 2002-09-26 at 14:40, Richard Bellavance wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 21:06, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> >
> > Personally I think we should always thread by subject no matter what,
> > anything less is just useless.
>
> You'd be surprised at the number of messages I receive which, while
>
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 00:40, Richard Bellavance wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 21:06, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> >
> > Personally I think we should always thread by subject no matter what,
> > anything less is just useless.
>
> You'd be surprised at the number of messages I receive which, while
>
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 21:06, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
>
> Personally I think we should always thread by subject no matter what,
> anything less is just useless.
You'd be surprised at the number of messages I receive which, while
having the same subject, are completely unrelated.
--
Richard Bell
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 06:51, Not Zed wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 06:36, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > See http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=22791
> >
> > It is configurable, but you have to hack the config file yourself. I
> > don't recall the option, but I'm sure you can find it (I kno
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 06:36, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> See http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=22791
>
> It is configurable, but you have to hack the config file yourself. I
> don't recall the option, but I'm sure you can find it (I know it has
> "thread" as part of the config param name).
Thank you! It appears to be called "thread_subject".
dbr
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 17:06, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> See http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=22791
>
> It is configurable, but you have to hack the config file yourself. I
> don't recall the option, but I'm sure you can find it
See http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=22791
It is configurable, but you have to hack the config file yourself. I
don't recall the option, but I'm sure you can find it (I know it has
"thread" as part of the config param name).
Jeff
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 16:28, David B. Ritch wrote:
> Co
Could this be made configurable? Threading by subject is not terribly
accurate, but is very convenient with dealing with mail from broken
clients.
Thanks,
David
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 18:58, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> CVS no longer threads by subject, so this won't be a problem anymore.
>
> Jef
CVS no longer threads by subject, so this won't be a problem anymore.
Jeff
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 18:27, Lennard Bakker wrote:
> Oke, a small problem (this is always the case ofcourse :)
> I have the view to 'threaded messages list'
> Now both person-A and person-B sends me a message with the sam
Oke, a small problem (this is always the case ofcourse :)
I have the view to 'threaded messages list'
Now both person-A and person-B sends me a message with the same subject.
I give reply to person-B and person-B gives a reply back.
With the 'threaded message list' the reply of person-B is list
10 matches
Mail list logo
