On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 19:04, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> While the mail is not actually rejected, it appears to the spammer as if
> it was sent to a non-existent address on the server. If the spammer is
> gathering and using this information, it thinks that the address is
> "dead" and deletes it fr
lør, 2002-12-28 kl. 04:04 skrev Arthur S. Alexion:
> > It's the job of the smtp mailserver to allow or deny mail domains.
>
> > There's absolutely no way Evo could reject spam before it receives it.
> > in your mail box.
> Perhaps this is clearer as to what I want to do. Kmail can generate a
>
On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 09:58, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> fre, 2002-12-27 kl. 14:43 skrev Arthur S. Alexion:
>
> > Finally got spamd/spamassassin configured and working, and it is a truly
> > nice piece of software. For a couple of days, I kept the
> > ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file open in an editor
fre, 2002-12-27 kl. 14:43 skrev Arthur S. Alexion:
> Finally got spamd/spamassassin configured and working, and it is a truly
> nice piece of software. For a couple of days, I kept the
> ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file open in an editor and tweaked the
> white/black lists, and now it seems to be
Finally got spamd/spamassassin configured and working, and it is a truly
nice piece of software. For a couple of days, I kept the
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file open in an editor and tweaked the
white/black lists, and now it seems to be extremely accurate.
But I don't run my own mail server, so,
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 18:30, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 15:44, Cliff Wells wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:19, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:42, Cliff Wells wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I could never get 'spamassassin -e' to work, but 'spamc -c' works
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 15:44, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:19, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:42, Cliff Wells wrote:
> > >
> > > I could never get 'spamassassin -e' to work, but 'spamc -c' works fine.
> >
> > I can't seem to get either to work, although it s
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:19, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:42, Cliff Wells wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 10:48, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> > > On Friday 20 December 2002 02:18 pm, you, Mertens Bram, wrote:
> > > > What is the "-f" option you want to use? I can't find it i
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:37, Philippe Chartier wrote:
> Le ven 20/12/2002 à 18:53, Aaron Weber a écrit :
> > Arthur:
> > The "pipe to shell command" option doesn't parse the arguments or
> > option flags (i.e. "spamassasin -f") which you would need to use.
> > That's why I suggested the shell scr
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:42, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 10:48, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> > On Friday 20 December 2002 02:18 pm, you, Mertens Bram, wrote:
> > > What is the "-f" option you want to use? I can't find it in the
> > > spamassassin documentation...
> >
> > I think h
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 10:48, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> On Friday 20 December 2002 02:18 pm, you, Mertens Bram, wrote:
> > What is the "-f" option you want to use? I can't find it in the
> > spamassassin documentation...
>
> I think he meant "-e" which is the same as "spamc -c" returning a
>
On Friday 20 December 2002 12:53 pm, Aaron Weber wrote:
> The "pipe to shell command" option doesn't parse the arguments or
> option flags (i.e. "spamassasin -f") which you would need to use.
> That's why I suggested the shell script.
you DO mean "spamassassin -e", right?
--
__
On Friday 20 December 2002 02:18 pm, you, Mertens Bram, wrote:
> What is the "-f" option you want to use? I can't find it in the
> spamassassin documentation...
I think he meant "-e" which is the same as "spamc -c" returning a
boolean value instead of writing flags.
--
___
Le ven 20/12/2002 à 18:53, Aaron Weber a écrit :
> Arthur:
> The "pipe to shell command" option doesn't parse the arguments or
> option flags (i.e. "spamassasin -f") which you would need to use.
> That's why I suggested the shell script.
>
> If you have good results without using the shell scrip
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 17:53, Aaron Weber wrote:
> Arthur:
> The "pipe to shell command" option doesn't parse the arguments or
> option flags (i.e. "spamassasin -f") which you would need to use.
> That's why I suggested the shell script.
>
> If you have good results without using the shell script
Arthur:
The "pipe to shell command" option doesn't parse the arguments or option flags (i.e. "spamassasin -f") which you would need to use. That's why I suggested the shell script.
If you have good results without using the shell script, let me know; I didn't have any luck with it, though.
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 07:36, Nicolas ROBAUX wrote:
> Le jeu 19/12/2002 à 12:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>
> > I tried emulating that with evolution's filters but got lost. Does
> > anyone have instructions for accomplishing this with evolution's
> > filters?
> >
>
> Hi ! I just found this l
Le jeu 19/12/2002 à 12:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> I tried emulating that with evolution's filters but got lost. Does
> anyone have instructions for accomplishing this with evolution's
> filters?
>
Hi ! I just found this link, looking for the same question yesterday !
:-)
http://support.
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 11:59, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> I used spamassassin successfully in kmail using the following
> instructions
[snip]
> I tried emulating that with evolution's filters but got lost. Does
> anyone have instructions for accomplishing this with evolution's
> filters?
This is in
I used spamassassin successfully in kmail using the following
instructions
The filter setup is the work of five minutes (if that!) if you
have a working spamassassin set up:
1. The Filter Criteria in question is "
." (that's a single dot).
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 06:20, Timothy Hoppa wrote:
> Is anyone using spamassassin to filer mail for evolution? How is this
> best accomplished?
>
Tim,
I'm using it, invoked from my local procmail.
Jim
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
Is anyone using spamassassin to filer mail for evolution? How is this
best accomplished?
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
___
evolution maillist -
22 matches
Mail list logo
