lør, 2002-12-28 kl. 04:04 skrev Arthur S. Alexion:
It's the job of the smtp mailserver to allow or deny mail domains.
There's absolutely no way Evo could reject spam before it receives it.
in your mail box.
Perhaps this is clearer as to what I want to do. Kmail can generate a
bounce
On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 19:04, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
While the mail is not actually rejected, it appears to the spammer as if
it was sent to a non-existent address on the server. If the spammer is
gathering and using this information, it thinks that the address is
dead and deletes it from
Finally got spamd/spamassassin configured and working, and it is a truly
nice piece of software. For a couple of days, I kept the
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file open in an editor and tweaked the
white/black lists, and now it seems to be extremely accurate.
But I don't run my own mail server,
fre, 2002-12-27 kl. 14:43 skrev Arthur S. Alexion:
Finally got spamd/spamassassin configured and working, and it is a truly
nice piece of software. For a couple of days, I kept the
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file open in an editor and tweaked the
white/black lists, and now it seems to be
On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 09:58, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
fre, 2002-12-27 kl. 14:43 skrev Arthur S. Alexion:
Finally got spamd/spamassassin configured and working, and it is a truly
nice piece of software. For a couple of days, I kept the
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file open in an editor and
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 18:30, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 15:44, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:19, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:42, Cliff Wells wrote:
I could never get 'spamassassin -e' to work, but 'spamc -c' works fine.
Arthur:
The pipe to shell command option doesn't parse the arguments or option flags (i.e. spamassasin -f) which you would need to use. That's why I suggested the shell script.
If you have good results without using the shell script, let me know; I didn't have any luck with it, though.
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 17:53, Aaron Weber wrote:
Arthur:
The pipe to shell command option doesn't parse the arguments or
option flags (i.e. spamassasin -f) which you would need to use.
That's why I suggested the shell script.
If you have good results without using the shell script, let me
Le ven 20/12/2002 à 18:53, Aaron Weber a écrit :
Arthur:
The pipe to shell command option doesn't parse the arguments or
option flags (i.e. spamassasin -f) which you would need to use.
That's why I suggested the shell script.
If you have good results without using the shell script, let me
On Friday 20 December 2002 02:18 pm, you, Mertens Bram, wrote:
What is the -f option you want to use? I can't find it in the
spamassassin documentation...
I think he meant -e which is the same as spamc -c returning a
boolean value instead of writing flags.
--
On Friday 20 December 2002 12:53 pm, Aaron Weber wrote:
The pipe to shell command option doesn't parse the arguments or
option flags (i.e. spamassasin -f) which you would need to use.
That's why I suggested the shell script.
you DO mean spamassassin -e, right?
--
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 10:48, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Friday 20 December 2002 02:18 pm, you, Mertens Bram, wrote:
What is the -f option you want to use? I can't find it in the
spamassassin documentation...
I think he meant -e which is the same as spamc -c returning a
boolean value
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:42, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 10:48, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Friday 20 December 2002 02:18 pm, you, Mertens Bram, wrote:
What is the -f option you want to use? I can't find it in the
spamassassin documentation...
I think he meant -e
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:37, Philippe Chartier wrote:
Le ven 20/12/2002 à 18:53, Aaron Weber a écrit :
Arthur:
The pipe to shell command option doesn't parse the arguments or
option flags (i.e. spamassasin -f) which you would need to use.
That's why I suggested the shell script.
If
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:19, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:42, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 10:48, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Friday 20 December 2002 02:18 pm, you, Mertens Bram, wrote:
What is the -f option you want to use? I can't find it in the
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 15:44, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:19, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:42, Cliff Wells wrote:
I could never get 'spamassassin -e' to work, but 'spamc -c' works fine.
I can't seem to get either to work, although it seems to be
I used spamassassin successfully in kmail using the following
instructions
The filter setup is the work of five minutes (if that!) if you
have a working spamassassin set up:
1. The Filter Criteria in question is any header
matches regexp .
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 11:59, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
I used spamassassin successfully in kmail using the following
instructions
[snip]
I tried emulating that with evolution's filters but got lost. Does
anyone have instructions for accomplishing this with evolution's
filters?
This is in the
Le jeu 19/12/2002 à 12:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
I tried emulating that with evolution's filters but got lost. Does
anyone have instructions for accomplishing this with evolution's
filters?
Hi ! I just found this link, looking for the same question yesterday !
:-)
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 07:36, Nicolas ROBAUX wrote:
Le jeu 19/12/2002 à 12:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
I tried emulating that with evolution's filters but got lost. Does
anyone have instructions for accomplishing this with evolution's
filters?
Hi ! I just found this link,
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 06:20, Timothy Hoppa wrote:
Is anyone using spamassassin to filer mail for evolution? How is this
best accomplished?
Tim,
I'm using it, invoked from my local procmail.
Jim
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is anyone using spamassassin to filer mail for evolution? How is this
best accomplished?
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
___
evolution maillist
22 matches
Mail list logo
