[Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-30 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hi list, big title, but probably not a big deal (at least for the case I'm exposing) After reading [1] and [2] and part of the HIG, I started to see lots of bad dialogs in evolution. I've already tried to fix some of this UI badness (imap-features plugin) but today I came across the "Customize Vi

Re: [Evolution-hackers] XML APIs in evolution

2007-05-30 Thread Ross Burton
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 16:42 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > The question is, what shall we do now ? The need for a cast is part of the (IMHO wrong) design of libxml2, the policy is that the libxml2 API requires UTF-8 strings, so they typedef xmlChar to unsigned char*. Application writers ar

[Evolution-hackers] XML APIs in evolution

2007-05-30 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hi list, while walking through the tree to create bug #437579 [1] patches, I've found that quite a bunch of warnings (most of them in fact) where relating to calls to libxml functions without casting. Typical situation is that you have a string "toto" and want to get the property of that node. Yo

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Improved vCard parser

2007-05-30 Thread Øystein Gisnås
2007/5/30, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 07:59 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: > > I posted some lines about improvements to the vCard parser, but it > > seems like getting multi-megabyte attachments take some time to get > > through to the mailing list. So I posted to my bl

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Improved vCard parser

2007-05-30 Thread Ross Burton
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 07:59 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: > I posted some lines about improvements to the vCard parser, but it > seems like getting multi-megabyte attachments take some time to get > through to the mailing list. So I posted to my blog instead: > http://n800evolution.blogspot.com/2007

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removal of DFSG non-free RFCs in evolution-exchange

2007-05-30 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hi Øystein, On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 08:03 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: > It seems like http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366250 didn't > make it for the 2.10.2 release monday. Unfortunately, it didn't make it to Monday's release, as Varadhan had to look at some critical exchange issue in th