[Evolution-hackers] future of evolution user docs.

2007-12-11 Thread Andre Klapper
for a long time, several people have been unhappy with the current state of the evolution user docs[1]. me too, but most of my rantings have been on irc so i can't link to them. ;-) when evolution 2.0 became an official part of GNOME 2.8, aaron was working full-time on the evolution docs. now my i

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Post-release version incrementing

2007-12-11 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Tor, It may not work out here, since the micro version is what we bump during release which is in sync with the GNOME Release micro version. (Evolution 2.21.3 == GNOME 2.21.3) Matt, I'm not against it, if it benefits hackers. Personally I don't use 2 versions and so It doesn't matter much to me.

[Evolution-hackers] New composer progress

2007-12-11 Thread Matthew Barnes
Several people have asked me about it, so I put together a wiki page detailing my plan and progress on the new composer widget I'm trying to finish for 2.22. Feel free to add comments or try out the code. http://www.go-evolution.org/New_Composer Matthew Barnes __

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Post-release version incrementing

2007-12-11 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le mardi 11 décembre 2007 à 00:35 -0500, Matthew Barnes a écrit : > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 03:29 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > May I suggest a third, in my opinion superior, way: Both. > > > > That's what cairo uses, see > > http://cairographics.org/manual/cairo-Version-Information.html . The >