Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI support not even close... ?!?! Can I help?

2009-12-03 Thread Jörgen Scheibengruber
Am Montag, den 30.11.2009, 22:24 +0100 schrieb ext Ross Burton: > On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 15:17 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > > PS. I was struck by running "ps -aef | grep evo" and seeing _NOTHING_ > > except the actual evolution binary there... bizarre! > > The EDS daemons are now called e-addressbook

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Filtering and mail split

2009-12-03 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: > As some of you may know, I've been looking into moving mail down to the > e-d-s level.  As a first step, I'm figuring out where to draw the line > between the front end and backend.  At the moment, I'm focusing on > filtering.  I think that

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Filtering and mail split

2009-12-03 Thread Jonathon Jongsma
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 19:23 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > The overall design of the filtering classes has always seemed a little > backwards to me. We need to be generating rule element widgets from an > S-expression, not generating the S-expression from rule element widgets. > > I have not stud

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Filtering and mail split

2009-12-03 Thread Jonathon Jongsma
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 20:35 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Jonathon Jongsma > wrote: > > As some of you may know, I've been looking into moving mail down to the > > e-d-s level. As a first step, I'm figuring out where to draw the line > > between the front end a

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Filtering and mail split

2009-12-03 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 09:41 -0600, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: > I like the concept in general, but I think the S-expression (or AST > representing the s-expression) is not enough to properly re-construct > a filter rule for editing. Consider the following example (yes, it's > slightly contrived, but

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI support not even close... ?!?! Can I help?

2009-12-03 Thread Reid Thompson
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 14:42 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > > Details: I'm running on Ubuntu 9.10 64bit. I am building from the > latest git master branch, updated as of this morning, for the > following gentoo > > - > Missing Subject: content: > > First, I got an error in the message bar tryi

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI support not even close... ?!?! Can I help?

2009-12-03 Thread Reid Thompson
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 14:54 +0200, Jörgen Scheibengruber wrote: > Am Montag, den 30.11.2009, 22:24 +0100 schrieb ext Ross Burton: > > On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 15:17 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > > > PS. I was struck by running "ps -aef | grep evo" and seeing > _NOTHING_ > > > except the actual evolution

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI support not even close... ?!?! Can I help?

2009-12-03 Thread Reid Thompson
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 16:10 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: > On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 14:54 +0200, Jörgen Scheibengruber wrote: > > Am Montag, den 30.11.2009, 22:24 +0100 schrieb ext Ross Burton: > > > On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 15:17 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > > > > PS. I was struck by running "ps -aef | gre

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI support not even close... ?!?! Can I help?

2009-12-03 Thread Thomas Novin
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 14:42 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > Hi all. I'm really confused by messages from people who say they're > using Evolution with MAPI support and it's working just fine for them. > I can't understand it: it's so far from working for me that there must > be something I'm doing wron