Re: [Evolution-hackers] Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

2016-10-05 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 15:13 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > seems to be better than autotools, gives more freedom and easily > allows the sources to be built much faster than with autotools (it > builds here in ~1/3 of the time which uses autotools, still using > "Unix Makefiles"). I know it's caused mo

Re: [Evolution-hackers] GSoC Ideas

2014-02-11 Thread Paul Smith
What I'd really love to have is the ability to select multiple messages (using CTRL-click etc.) and then choose "reply" and have it create a new message replying to the set of people the original message was addressed to (removing duplicates), and including quoted copies of all the selected message

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Reconsidering our release cycle

2013-07-24 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 10:58 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > My concern is that it could also be longer before new features and > fixes actually make it into a release. For example, if we were on an > annual schedule and people were still using Evolution 3.6 today > instead of Evolution 3.8 we'd

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Regular core dumps in Evo 3.6.0

2013-01-30 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 13:05 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > I did file a bug (sorry I forgot to post that here). But today I used > jhbuild to create a local Evo 3.6.4 and tried that, and it worked fine > so that bug has been fixed since 3.6.0 was released and I resolved the > bug ag

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Regular core dumps in Evo 3.6.0

2013-01-23 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 14:51 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 20:35 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > > Yeah, I also think the backend doesn't matter. It'll be good to save > > the message as mbox, strip private information from it and share it at > > [1], w

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Regular core dumps in Evo 3.6.0

2013-01-21 Thread Paul Smith
Hi Milan; On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 20:35 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > Yeah, I also think the backend doesn't matter. It'll be good to save > the message as mbox, strip private information from it and share it at > [1], which seems to be the same crash, I only wasn't able to find the > message or otherw

[Evolution-hackers] Regular core dumps in Evo 3.6.0

2013-01-21 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; I'm using Evolution 3.6.0 in GNU/Linux Mint 14 with Cinnamon as the desktop. I'm using IMAP+ to access 3 different IMAP accounts: two Google accounts and one "normal" IMAP (from my ISP; I think using Dovecot). I'm finding that I'm getting core dumps in Evolution fairly often: once every c

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.28 obsolete?

2011-01-27 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 16:04 +, Matt Davey wrote: > I recently logged a bug (#639970) that crops up every now and again for > me, and it was closed as OBSOLETE because I raised it against Evolution > 2.28. This surprised me, because this 2.28 is the current shipping > version for Ubuntu 10.04 L

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Wrong factories starting after alternative installs?

2010-11-29 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 17:55 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > That's exactly where I got my version originally. I did, just to be > sure, try copying that verbatim into session.local.conf then logging > out and back in, but it didn't help. OK, I read some man pages about dbus-da

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Wrong factories starting after alternative installs?

2010-11-29 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 14:51 -0600, Matthew Barnes wrote: > The config file looks right to me. I gave a similar example awhile > back which you might try copying verbatim: > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2010-March/msg00023.html That's exactly where I got my version original

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution build script

2010-11-29 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 15:00 -0500, Kenny,Vale wrote: > I'm trying to build Evolution using Paul Smith's script and having > virtually 0 luck. I get the following: > > http://pastebin.ca/2006084 I've just tried this and sure enough, there's a bug in the evolution builds. Applying this patch fixe

[Evolution-hackers] Wrong factories starting after alternative installs?

2010-11-29 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; So, I've been using my makefile to build Evolution 2.32 (latest gnome-2-32 branch actually) on my Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick) system and it's basically working. However, when I start Evolution it's invoking the wrong factory apps. To start with I run "evolution --force-shutdown" and verify t

Re: [Evolution-hackers] ExchangeServer 2003: MAPI or Exchange?

2010-11-29 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 19:23 +, Herbert Stiftler wrote: > in my company we use an Exchange server 2003. As I'm planning to > switching to ubuntu, I'm interested in using evolution for email. > As i see, there are two options to connect to exchange server: > evolution-mapi and evolution-exchange

[Evolution-hackers] configure issue with e-d-s and evolution

2010-11-10 Thread Paul Smith
In evolution-data-server if you want to build without the weather utility you pass --without-weather. But in evolution if you want to build without weather built in you pass --disable weather. Doh!! Can someone fix these to be consistent with each other? Thanks. __

[Evolution-hackers] issues trying to build 2.32 from git

2010-11-06 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; just wanted to give a heads-up on issues I found while trying to get my makefile working with the gnome-2.32 branch. Note I've not even attempted most of the extra add-ons like evolution-mapi etc. First, Evo 2.32 requires a newer gtkhtml, but the gtkhtml "master" configure.ac turns on the

[Evolution-hackers] New evo build makefile available

2010-11-06 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; I've updated my makefile for building Evolution from git: http://mad-scientist.net/evolution.html This version supports Lucid and Maverick. Note it is NOT completely tested. I was able to successfully build the 2.32 version of Evolution on Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick), building only these pa

[Evolution-hackers] Patch for build failures in gnome-2.32 branch

2010-11-03 Thread Paul Smith
The current head of the gnome-2.32 git branch in evolution-data-server fails to compile cleanly because necessary -I options are not provided. Not sure if this needs to be applied to the master head as well. diff --git a/calendar/backends/file/Makefile.am b/calendar/backends/file/Makefile.am in

[Evolution-hackers] Gnome 3.0 delay & Evo?

2010-07-28 Thread Paul Smith
I wonder if Matthew or Milan or anyone have any thoughts on what the delay in Gnome 3.0 means for Evolution. Is the current git master buildable and usable without Gnome 3.0 components? Do you expect distros to build and ship both Gnome 2.x and 3.0 versions, to make transitions simpler?

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo won't display special characters

2010-07-12 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 09:51 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > yup, I've this in my todo list, since 21/06/2010, but due to other work > I didn't get to it yet. I'm sorry. No problem. > Just to summarize, you've an issue involving > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610797 > that with a patch th

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo won't display special characters

2010-07-10 Thread Paul Smith
hese messages. Tres embarrassing!! If someone provides a patch I'm happy to test it. On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 08:55 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > Hi all; I was away last week. > > Anyone have any ideas about how to push this issue forward? Is it a > problem/missing feature in Evo or in gt

Re: [Evolution-hackers] IMAP vs. IMAPX in Evo 2.30--recommendations?

2010-06-30 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 11:03 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 15:22 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > > Hi all. I'm wondering if anyone can provide a summary/recommendation > > for IMAP vs. IMAP+ (IMAPX) in Evo 2.30 (I'm actually building the very > >

[Evolution-hackers] IMAP vs. IMAPX in Evo 2.30--recommendations?

2010-06-29 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all. I'm wondering if anyone can provide a summary/recommendation for IMAP vs. IMAP+ (IMAPX) in Evo 2.30 (I'm actually building the very latest gnome-2.30 branch from git)? I use a dovecot IMAP server which I don't think supports any of the advanced IMAP features (?), but I see that the IMAPX

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo won't display special characters

2010-06-29 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; I was away last week. Anyone have any ideas about how to push this issue forward? Is it a problem/missing feature in Evo or in gtkhtml? Or both? On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 18:17 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 14:14 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-04-17

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo won't display special characters

2010-06-22 Thread Paul Smith
Any love re: this problem? Embarrassingly, I'm reduced to forwarding these emails to my Exchange account (!) and reading them via lookOut! (!!) in Crossover Linux ... ouch! On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 18:17 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 14:14 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: &g

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo won't display special characters

2010-06-20 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 14:14 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 23:13 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > > Hi all. Occasionally I get email from someone and they include a > > special character in the email (this is html mail). When this happens, > > the entire para

[Evolution-hackers] Build failure on gnome-2-30 branch

2010-06-18 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; trying to build the latest git changes from the 2.30 branch gives me: make[4]: Entering directory `/opt/src/evo/evo-2.30/obj/evolution/smime/lib' CC libessmime_la-e-cert.lo CC libessmime_la-e-cert-db.lo CC libessmime_la-e-pkcs12.lo CCLD libessmime.la .libs/libessmime_

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo 2.30 git branch: "not junk" icon enormous?

2010-04-29 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 17:28 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > Log into Bugzilla, go to Preferences -> Email Preferences and make > sure things are set the way you want. I did, and they were, but I'm not getting any email. I take it your response means you are getting bugzilla mail? I was wonderin

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo 2.30 git branch: "not junk" icon enormous?

2010-04-29 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 11:05 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 10:24 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > > But, someone (maybe me!) has made a mistake here. The freedesktop.org > > icon naming specification CLEARLY shows that the name of the icon is > > "mai

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo won't display special characters

2010-04-28 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 14:14 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 23:13 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > > Hi all. Occasionally I get email from someone and they include a > > special character in the email (this is html mail). When this happens, > > the entire para

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo won't display special characters

2010-04-27 Thread Paul Smith
Anyone have any thoughts on this? If I file a bug, should it go to evolution, or something like gtkhtml or libxml or something else? I'm not really clear on the breakdown in responsibility for the Gnome components in Evo. On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 23:13 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo 2.30 git branch: "not junk" icon enormous?

2010-04-27 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 10:37 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 17:04 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > > Sounds like a gnome-icon-theme issue to me. Last week they suddenly > > and without warning dropped the "mail-mark-notjunk" icon from their > > &qu

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo 2.30 git branch: "not junk" icon enormous?

2010-04-27 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 17:04 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > Sounds like a gnome-icon-theme issue to me. Last week they suddenly > and without warning dropped the "mail-mark-notjunk" icon from their > "stable" release, as apparently it was a redundant and misspelled > version of the correct icon nam

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo 2.30 git branch: "not junk" icon enormous?

2010-04-26 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 17:04 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 09:51 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > > Hi all. I finally succeeded in building Evo from the gnome-2.30 git > > branch head, and It's running. One thing I notice is that the "not > > j

[Evolution-hackers] Evo 2.30 git branch: "not junk" icon enormous?

2010-04-26 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all. I finally succeeded in building Evo from the gnome-2.30 git branch head, and It's running. One thing I notice is that the "not junk" icon is really huge: about twice as high, it looks like, as the other icons (it's a crumpled piece of paper in an inbox tray, with a red "x" button overlaye

Re: [Evolution-hackers] GIT master failing evolution-data-server build...

2010-04-26 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 14:48 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > I do not see these myself, but from other experience I believe it's > linking to wrong GLib, to the older one, than it is compiled with, or > some other module it is linking to itself is using a newer GLib. I've discovered you're correct. We

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-mapi is failing to compile on gnome-2.30 branch

2010-04-26 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 14:37 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > you've too new OpenChange, the API for this function changed. It is > fixed on master, and now on gnome-2-30 too. Please update your git repo > or download 0.30.1 tar-ball. Thanks Milan; I'm trying it now... and success! Thanks.

[Evolution-hackers] evolution-mapi is failing to compile on gnome-2.30 branch

2010-04-25 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; trying to build the gnome-2.30 branch of the evolution-mapi component is currently failing to compile: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/src/evo/evo-2.30/obj/evolution-mapi/src' Making all in libexchangemapi make[4]: Entering directory `/home/src/evo/evo-2.30/obj/evolution-mapi/src/libex

Re: [Evolution-hackers] GIT master failing evolution-data-server build...

2010-04-23 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; this is still failing. Anyone have any ideas on where to look or how to move past the problem? Thanks! On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 18:13 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > Hi all. Trying to build the current git master of evolution-data-server > is failing to link test-ebook-remove: > >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Failing to configure libgdata from git master?

2010-04-21 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 10:42 -0500, C de-Avillez wrote: > At least for Ubuntu Lucid, the macro is provided by the > gobject-introspection package -- so, I guess we may need a new > dependency there. The version of gobject-introspection in Karmic doesn't provide this file. _

[Evolution-hackers] GIT master failing evolution-data-server build...

2010-04-20 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all. Trying to build the current git master of evolution-data-server is failing to link test-ebook-remove: Making all in ebook make[5]: Entering directory `/home/psmith/src/evo/evo-master/obj/evolution-data-server/addressbook/tests/ebook' CC libebook_test_utils_la-ebook-test-utils.lo

[Evolution-hackers] Failing to configure libgdata from git master?

2010-04-19 Thread Paul Smith
Hi Philip; all the docs I saw for libgdata list just your address as a contact; if there's a mailing list or similar you'd like me to CC please let me know. I maintain a makefile that allows people to build Evolution from the latest git sources along with a significant chunk of other Gnome (and so

[Evolution-hackers] Evo won't display special characters

2010-04-17 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all. Occasionally I get email from someone and they include a special character in the email (this is html mail). When this happens, the entire paragraph/section of that email is completely elided and only a [?] token is shown in the email, no matter how large the HTML segment is. As an examp

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Build failing in the gnome-2.30 branch

2010-04-09 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 14:08 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 12:23 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > > Hi all; I'm trying to build the gnome-2.30 branch using my makefile and > > I'm getting this compile error (last build was successful from this > > bra

[Evolution-hackers] Evo master branch depends on gtk+ 2.20, but no git tag?

2010-04-08 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all. The Evo master git branch now has a dependency on gtk+ 2.20, but when I go to the gtk+ GIT repository there is no branch for gtk-2.20. http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/ shows a branch for gtk-2-18 and gtk-2-90. Is there a branch for bugfixes, etc. to gtk+ 2.20? Or should I be using mas

[Evolution-hackers] Build failing in the gnome-2.30 branch

2010-04-08 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; I'm trying to build the gnome-2.30 branch using my makefile and I'm getting this compile error (last build was successful from this branch, last week or so): make[4]: Entering directory `/opt/src/evo/evo-2.30/obj/evolution/modules/network-manager' CC libevolution_module_network_mana

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution master does not build

2010-03-16 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 19:17 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 18:25 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > > Hi Matt; where were they committed? I pulled the latest git HEAD and I > > don't see these changes... see my previous email (sorry I posted without > > r

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution master does not build

2010-03-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 15:49 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 20:06 +0100, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote: > > In latest git master, I had to update the Makefile.am in > > evolution/capplet/settings to make it build: > > Thanks, changes committed. Hi Matt; where were they committed?

[Evolution-hackers] Build failure on git HEAD

2010-03-15 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; the latest changes in caplet/settings are not compiling properly. I just pulled the very latest git HEAD as of 6pm EDT; I saw Matt's change regarding link libraries but that didn't help my builds (I tried a completely clean rebuild) (run with AM_V_CCLD= so we can see the command): /bin/sh

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Another build failure

2010-02-08 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 07:09 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: > > Works now, thanks. I'm updating my web page related to my Makefile. > > I'm not sure how difficult it would be to get it working on Red Hat. > > I would think not very hard, all the dependencies should already be > there. > Getting it to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Another build failure

2010-02-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 16:36 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > I still can't reproduce these build failures myself for some reason, > so if you could verify there are no more linking problems I'd > appreciate it greatly since we have a release tomorrow. Works now, thanks. I'm updating my web page rel

[Evolution-hackers] Another build failure

2010-02-07 Thread Paul Smith
Thanks, Matt, for fixing the linker problem with libunique. Now my builds fail during plugin compilation, here: CCLD liborg-gnome-evolution-google.la .libs/liborg_gnome_evolution_google_la-google-source.o: In function `plugin_google': /home/psmith/src/evo/evo-master/obj/evolution/plugins/goo

[Evolution-hackers] Build failing in evolution/shell in latest MASTER git

2010-02-06 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; I just did an update of my git workspaces and tried a clean build, and the compile of "evolution" is failing in the evolution/shell directory, as below. I do have libunique 1.1.2-1 installed, including the dev package, so the configure test passes and even the compilation works as you can

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Build failures with latest git in evolution-mapi

2010-02-02 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 17:42 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote: > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 16:57 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > > Hi all; > > > > Since the openchange project recently added a new feature, I think there > > are compile problems in evolution-mapi. Doing a full git u

[Evolution-hackers] Build failures with latest git in evolution-mapi

2010-02-02 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; Since the openchange project recently added a new feature, I think there are compile problems in evolution-mapi. Doing a full git upgrade (and svn upgrade of openchange) an hour or two ago, then a complete clean build, I get these warnings (the warnings MIGHT have been there before, I can

Re: [Evolution-hackers] gcc 4.4 may be causing a number of bugs in Evolution

2010-02-02 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 15:21 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 15:00 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 14:30 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > If you want to get warnings about the aliasing stuff, it seems that > > > -Wstrict-ali

Re: [Evolution-hackers] gcc 4.4 may be causing a number of bugs in Evolution

2010-02-02 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 14:30 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > Matthew Barnes wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 12:27 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > > > >> Anyway, I agree with you that if Evo makes use of this type of aliasing > >> then we should definitely add that f

Re: [Evolution-hackers] gcc 4.4 may be causing a number of bugs in Evolution

2010-02-02 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 11:05 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > Paul Smith wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 11:52 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > >> This weekend I discovered a particularly nasty bug in gcc 4.4 where gcc > >> would mistakenly optimize out imp

Re: [Evolution-hackers] gcc 4.4 may be causing a number of bugs in Evolution

2010-02-01 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 11:52 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > This weekend I discovered a particularly nasty bug in gcc 4.4 where gcc > would mistakenly optimize out important sections of code > when it encountered a particular trick used in a ton of places inside > Evolution (EDList and pretty much

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-mapi exchange 2007 fails to send messages encoding in non-english characters

2010-02-01 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 11:37 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 01:04 -0800, Fred Liu wrote: > > Is there anyone who has ever met this? > > Hi, > there have been some bug reports in https://bugzilla.gnome.org but the > fix came to the quite recent: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/s

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Git MASTER won't build

2010-01-28 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 16:30 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > Then, after fixing this (I just removed the changes) I got this makefile > error: > > make[5]: Entering directory > `/opt/src/evo/evo-master/obj/evolution/plugins/mail-to-task' > CC liborg_gnome_mail_to_task_la-m

[Evolution-hackers] Git MASTER won't build

2010-01-28 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; someone (POC?) mentioned this a few hours ago but silly me, I didn't notice and tried to grab the latest stuff to test some of the bug fixes going in. Currently the git master is quite broken; I'm getting compile errors due to diff3 fragments left in the code: # modified: calendar

Re: [Evolution-hackers] mail address validation

2010-01-21 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 20:17 +0100, Roberto -MadBob- Guido wrote: > In the first version of the patch > ( http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=146701 ) > I've provided a routine built on regular expressions (regcomp() and > regexec()). Opinions about that? Please read my comment

[Evolution-hackers] Build error in current Evo source

2010-01-17 Thread Paul Smith
Hi; I tried to update and build Matt's recent commit but it fails (not sure it's Matt's commit but...): ../../../evolution/composer/e-composer-private.c: In function 'e_composer_paste_text': ../../../evolution/composer/e-composer-private.c:620: error: implicit declaration of function 'gtkhtml_ed

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Getting a core in latest git Evolution view Junk folder

2010-01-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 14:50 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 08:04 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > > ... Since the failure appears to be related to determining something > > about attachments. > > ... > > As I mentioned, it's connecting to an IMAP serv

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Getting a core in latest git Evolution view Junk folder

2010-01-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 13:13 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > I'm on actual master as well, and I do not see this. I tried to select > Junk folder of my IMAP account, under On This Computer, but none of > these exhibits your issue. To be clear, it doesn't happen to me ALL the time. Only sometimes; maybe

[Evolution-hackers] Getting a core in latest git Evolution view Junk folder

2010-01-06 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all. I have a situation in the very latest git Evolution built earlier today (also happened with my previous build which was a few days old). Whenever I click on my Junk folder Evo dumps core. It seems to be an error displaying the summary of my Junk folder. I'm avoiding it right now. FYI,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Moving from the single mbox file format for the local folders

2009-12-17 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 12:50 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > Milan Crha wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 19:50 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > >> The standard way to nest Maildir folders is such: > >> > >> Maildir/ > >>cur/ > >>new/ > >>tmp/ > >>.GNOME/ > >> cur/ > >>

[Evolution-hackers] Code typo in current evolution-mapi git master head

2009-12-10 Thread Paul Smith
Hi guys; please apply this patch to fix a build error. Cheers! diff --git a/src/libexchangemapi/exchange-mapi-connection.c b/src/libexchangemapi/exchange-mapi-connection.c index c7ce8f8..76ad8b9 100644 --- a/src/libexchangemapi/exchange-mapi-connection.c +++ b/src/libexchangemapi/exchange-mapi-c

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Openchange website/svn/etc. down?

2009-12-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:19 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote: > On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 10:30 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > > Anyone know what's going on with Openchange? I can't reach their > > website, their SVN repository, etc...?

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI support not even close... ?!?! Can I help?

2009-12-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 08:47 +0530, Johnny Jacob wrote: > > I vaguely remembered that you have to use the Exchange server IP > > address, not hostname (lame!!) so I tried that and I did get it to > > connect without crashing this time (uber-lame!!) > > This crash seems to be a issue with the specif

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI support not even close... ?!?! Can I help?

2009-12-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 14:25 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > I tried this and it's a disaster. Every single attempt to connect to > the Exchange 2007 server causes Evolution to dump core. I had to start > it with --offline to keep it up long enough that I could delete my > Exchange

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI support not even close... ?!?! Can I help?

2009-12-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 22:34 +0100, Thomas Novin wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 14:42 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > > Hi all. I'm really confused by messages from people who say they're > > using Evolution with MAPI support and it's working just fine for them. > >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] I broke junk filtering config -- help!

2009-12-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:58 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > this all should be manageable from Preferences itself, try > Edit->Preferences->Mail Preferences, tab Junk, whether you've enabled > automatic junk filtering in global, This was enabled (first thing I tested). > then, just in case, in Mail >

[Evolution-hackers] Openchange website/svn/etc. down?

2009-12-07 Thread Paul Smith
Anyone know what's going on with Openchange? I can't reach their website, their SVN repository, etc...? ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Anyone doing nightly builds for SUSE?

2009-12-04 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:00 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote: > > Barring that, what would be the best way to test the current unstable > > release of Evolution? Should I just compile it from source and run it > > from my home directory? Again, I fear the list of "dev" package > > dependencies. > > AF

Re: [Evolution-hackers] I broke junk filtering config -- help!

2009-12-04 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 12:21 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: > On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 12:11 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > > Looking at the /apps/evolution/mail/junk/bogofilter section of gconf > > with gconf-editor, I see only one entry here, "unicode" which is > > selecte

[Evolution-hackers] I broke junk filtering config -- help!

2009-12-04 Thread Paul Smith
Urk. So, in an effort to try to create a "clean" install for Evolution to see if that was my problem, I did a stupid thing. I renamed my ~/.evolution directory (not the stupid thing) then I used gconf-editor to try to remove key entries for all my existing accounts, etc. (that was the stupid thin

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI support not even close... ?!?! Can I help?

2009-12-04 Thread Paul Smith
Hey Reid; what did you have to do to get this working? I tried modifying my configuration then sending HUP to both the system dbus-daemon and my local dbus-daemon, but when I restart evo I still don't see any extra factory applications start. Did you have to kill them outright? Do they restart?

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI support not even close... ?!?! Can I help?

2009-12-04 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 09:30 +, Ross Burton wrote: > You installed evolution-data-server into a prefix that DBus doesn't > know about, so it can't autostart the daemons. Huh. Well, that could definitely be a major part of my problem :-) The question is, isn't there any way to provide a local

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI support not even close... ?!?! Can I help?

2009-11-30 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 19:59 +, Ross Burton wrote: > Considering that e-d-s master has just been ported to DBus, and > evolution has just had Bonobo removed, I really recommend that you run > the gnome-2-28 branches of the GNOME modules. Running master means > you acknowledge that stuff may wel

[Evolution-hackers] MAPI support not even close... ?!?! Can I help?

2009-11-30 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all. I'm really confused by messages from people who say they're using Evolution with MAPI support and it's working just fine for them. I can't understand it: it's so far from working for me that there must be something I'm doing wrong or something about my environment which is very different f

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Failing to build latest GIT code

2009-11-25 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 15:05 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > Do you know of a good way to make that more detectable for developers, > short of uninstalling Evolution? > > We've had several similar "insufficent LIBADD" bugs lately, all of which > slipped in under my radar because I keep Evolution ins

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Failing to build latest GIT code

2009-11-25 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 11:48 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > hrm, I would like to know why I didn't face that when doing the change > there. Maybe an older gcc or something? You will only hit this if you don't already have Evo installed. If you have it installed then the link will use the installed ver

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo master dumps core: missing GConf key

2009-11-24 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 15:01 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > Run this as yourself (not super user): > > gconftool-2 > --install-schema-file .../shell/apps_evolution_shell.schemas That worked, although it still dumped core until I also added the evolution-mail.schemas file. Now it starts OK. I do

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo master dumps core: missing GConf key

2009-11-24 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 16:53 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > The Makefiles are set up automatically install schema files, but only if > you are -NOT- using a custom install prefix, which I assume you are (I > am too). I'm not sure I fully understand the rationale for that, but I > looked at some oth

[Evolution-hackers] Evo master dumps core: missing GConf key

2009-11-24 Thread Paul Smith
I've been using Evo from the 2.28 branch (built using my makefile). Now I wanted to switch to using Evo from the master branch. It built and installed OK, along with e-d-s, evo-mapi, openchange, etc. but, when I try to run it it dumps core immediately: (evolution:30186): e-data-server-DEBUG: Lo

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Failing to build latest GIT code

2009-11-24 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 12:15 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > What am I missing here? found it. Please apply this patch to fix the build: diff --git a/mail/importers/Makefile.am b/mail/importers/Makefile.am index 8851981..e25857c 100644 --- a/mail/importers/Makefile.am +++ b/mail/importers/Makefile

[Evolution-hackers] Failing to build latest GIT code

2009-11-24 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all. For the last week or so I've been trying to compile Evolution from the GIT master branch, and it's been failing to compile with this error every time; I waited a week to see if anyone else hit (and fixed) this but apparently it's something broken about my system; the build of all the evo c

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel Manifesto

2009-11-20 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 14:21 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > The sqlite backend stuff could also use some work. As far as I'm > aware, the tables are non-optimal. I really think it would be worthwhile engaging someone who has "SQL guru" on their resume and asking them for help on this. Maybe just

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Want to contribute to evolution-mapi

2009-11-11 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 00:54 +0530, Johnny Jacob wrote: > On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 08:57 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 18:09 +0530, balaji cherukuri wrote: > > > I am a software engineer, I want to contribute to evolution-mapi. > > > Could you give some guidance how would I pro

[Evolution-hackers] build failure / core in 2.28 git branch...?

2009-10-30 Thread Paul Smith
So, I tried to update to the latest on the 2.28 git branch and Badness Ensued. First the build failed; I used Reid's patch to fix it and that worked but it would be nice if someone actually promoted the fix into git. However, now Evo is dumping core immediately upon start (I don't even get a wind

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Errors logging into MAPI

2009-10-21 Thread Paul Smith
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 17:30 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > Hi all. I've been updating my Evo Makefile to build the latest 2.28 > version of evolution. > > When I try to connect to my exchange 2007 server using MAPI, it asks for > my password but then says that the login failed.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Core dumps from Evolution

2009-10-21 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 08:30 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > if anyone knows offhand the remedy for this??? > > > Running git checkout for openchange > Initialized empty Git repository in > /home/rthompso/madscientist/openchange/.git/ > error: server certificate verification failed. CAfile:

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Core dumps from Evolution

2009-10-20 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 12:07 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > I've been building 2.28 using the previously posted modified by someone > else for git version of the makefile. My last build was Oct 10, as of > yesterday I think the only diffs since then were translations. Evo's > been running fine for

[Evolution-hackers] Errors logging into MAPI

2009-10-18 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all. I've been updating my Evo Makefile to build the latest 2.28 version of evolution. When I try to connect to my exchange 2007 server using MAPI, it asks for my password but then says that the login failed. It seems to work to some extent, though, because I see my folders etc. Looking at t

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Core dumps from Evolution

2009-10-17 Thread Paul Smith
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 18:42 +0100, Tobias Mueller wrote: > > #0 0x7f49a9ddab0a in __xmlParserInputBufferCreateFilename > > (URI=0x7f4994045710 > > "/home/psmith/.evolution/mail/config/et-expanded-imap:__paul+mad-scientist...@localhost:40993_INBOX", > > enc=XML_CHAR_ENCODING_NONE) at ../../l

[Evolution-hackers] Core dumps from Evolution

2009-10-15 Thread Paul Smith
Hi all; I reconstituted my makefile for building Evo from scratch, and I'm building from the latest gnome-2.28 GIT branch. I'm seeing pretty common core dumps, all of which have the same signature: #0 0x7f49a9ddab0a in __xmlParserInputBufferCreateFilename (URI=0x7f4994045710 "/home/psmith

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Index on sqlite database

2009-08-01 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 18:28 +0200, Romuald Brunet wrote: > After a bit of exploring the folders.db sqlite file, I've found out > that there is an index on every table named SINDEX-table that is an > index for *every* column in the table. > > In practice, that means that the index will never be use

Re: [Evolution-hackers] External editor plugin

2008-09-17 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 08:20 -0400, Reid.Thompson wrote: > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 11:22 +0530, Sankar wrote: > > Will such a workflow be not best done by having vi/emacs style > > key-bindings for the composer body area , rather than opening a > > external program ? > > Is this being implemented/con

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution: Taking forward...

2008-07-11 Thread Paul Smith
> * Move Evolution licensing to "LGPL v2 and LGPL v3" to let us re-use > the code more easily around the platform. I'm a little concerned with this plan in conjunction with the "getting rid of copyright assignment" plan. Once you start accepting a significant amount of code without copyright ass

  1   2   >