I hereby allow you to relicense all the code I wrote for evolution and
evolution-data-server under the terms of the LGPL v2 and LGPL v3.
This includes the code that supports addressbooks on a webdav server and
all other code I have contributed to evolution.
Greetings,
Matthias Braun
Am
I hereby allow you to relicense all the code I wrote for evolution and
evolution-data-server under the terms of the LGPL v2 and LGPL v3.
This includes the code that supports addressbooks on a webdav server and
all other code I have contributed to evolution.
Greetings,
Matze
Am Freitag,
Am 11.07.2008 um 13:21 schrieb Srinivasa Ragavan:
Hello guys,
We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some
time like :
* Copyright assignments, which is not the best way looking for
the future of Evolution. It sucks and sort of limits contributions
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
Hello guys,
We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some time like :
* Copyright assignments, which is not the best way looking for the
future of Evolution. It sucks and sort of limits
* Move Evolution licensing to LGPL v2 and LGPL v3 to let us re-use
the code more easily around the platform. This also moves us closer to
Thunderbird's MPL/LGPL model.
I am told that you guys have found some of my code in Evolution that
is gpl2 (only) and that you would like to have
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
It would be really helpful if you can post a public/explicit mail with
permissions to do it, or code pointers - if you think you wrote a
piece of Evolution code object.
Permission granted for default-mailer plugin (and any other code
I remember sending an Evolution copyright assignment to Ximian. Just
in case you also need my permission, but could not reach me via old
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I agree to the re-licensing of any Evolution code I have written.
Would be nice if you changed the email, or, if you are not aware of
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
Hello guys,
It would be really helpful if you can post a public/explicit mail with
permissions to do it, or code pointers - if you think you wrote a
piece of Evolution code object.
Permission granted for any pieces i've personally
Permission granted to relicence my code (committed as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Thanks,
Philip
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
Hello guys,
We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some time like :
* Copyright
Hi,
[As Srini asked me to do this,]
I approve the planned license change for all of the code I ever
contributed to Evolution.
Cheers,
-Michael
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
Hello
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:35 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
It would be really helpful if you can post a public/explicit mail with
permissions to do it, or code pointers - if you think you wrote a
piece of Evolution code object.
Hey Folks,
On 11.07.2008 12:21 Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
It would be really helpful if you can post a public/explicit mail with permissions
to do it, or code pointers - if you think you wrote a piece of Evolution code
object.
Permission granted to relicense the code I've produced to LGPL
2008-07-11 (금), 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan 쓰시길:
We think this is good for Evolution and (of course) we continue to
invest in Evolution. We are also working to ensure we have the rights
to re-license all of the code. We will do the licensing/header changes
as we audit the code ownership
And another one, who's been poked about this mail. Sorry, kind of missed
it, despite discussing this at GUADEC.
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
* Drop Evolution copyright assignments and make it really easy to
contribute to Evolution
* Move Evolution licensing to
Hello,
Apparently I've been told that I have some code in evolution, despite having
no memory of it. Anyway, since I assume you guys know better than I do, I
guess I do.
So in that case, feel free to relicense any of my code as outlined below.
George
Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
Hello guys,
I was kindly asked for this:
Permission granted for any pieces of code I've produced.
Lucian Langa.
We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for
some time like :
* Copyright assignments, which is not the best way
After getting explicitly asked for this:
Permission granted for any pieces of code I've produced.
andre klapper
Am Freitag, den 11.07.2008, 04:21 -0600 schrieb Srinivasa Ragavan:
We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some time like :
* Copyright assignments,
fr., 11.07.2008 kl. 04.21 -0600, skrev Srinivasa Ragavan:
Hello guys,
We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some time like :
* Copyright assignments, which is not the best way looking for the
future of Evolution. It sucks and sort of limits contributions to
I just wanted to chime in and say AWESOME!!! :-)
It is my hope that now that Evolution no longer requires assignment,
that we'll see more developers get involved with improving it - who
knows, maybe someone will even contribute an uber IMAP
implementation? :-)
Jeff (retired Evolution hacker)
On
On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 13:56 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Could you consider talking with the samba guys to make libmapi LGPLv3?
That would make things much easier, right?
Yep - would make life easier; OTOH I've spoken to them in the past
along these lines - but though they were
On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 00:14 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Sure - but there are real problems persuading lawyers
... and developers ...
to license code
under a license that doesn't yet exist that they havn't read :-)
AfC
Sydney
--
Andrew Frederick Cowie
Operational Dynamics is an
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
* The current licensing incompatibility issues of Evolution with
Samba4/libmapi (GPLv3). Evolution needs to link with libmapi/samba4
for the new mapi based connector being developed for Exchange 2007.
[...]
* Move Evolution
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 15:30 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
* Move Evolution licensing to LGPL v2 and LGPL v3 to let us re-use
the code more easily around the platform.
Did you mean LGPLv2 _or_ LGPLv3 here?
Yes; it's dual licensed - which gives people rather a choice of
23 matches
Mail list logo
