On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 14:22 -0400, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 11:37 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 15:21 +0200, Butrus Damaskus wrote:
> > > New version of iCalendar was accepted as RFC 5545 (see eg.
> > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545.txt). Does
On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 11:37 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 15:21 +0200, Butrus Damaskus wrote:
> > New version of iCalendar was accepted as RFC 5545 (see eg.
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545.txt). Does this mean something
> > for evolution development? :-o
>
> Looks
On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 15:21 +0200, Butrus Damaskus wrote:
> New version of iCalendar was accepted as RFC 5545 (see eg.
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545.txt). Does this mean something
> for evolution development? :-o
Looks like it's basically just errata from RFC 2445 (see page 166). I'm
su
High!
New version of iCalendar was accepted as RFC 5545 (see eg.
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545.txt). Does this mean something
for evolution development? :-o
B.
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/
