On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 22:25 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 03:25 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 11:58 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > I took a look at the IDLE implementation last night and felt it went
> > > about it the wrong way.
> >
> > Yes
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 11:58 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> I took a look at the IDLE implementation last night and felt it went
> about it the wrong way.
Yes, you are right. I think the right fix is to create a new API called
camel_tcp_stream_wait that works like this:
int bytes = camel_tcp_st
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 03:25 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 11:58 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > I took a look at the IDLE implementation last night and felt it went
> > about it the wrong way.
>
> Yes, you are right. I think the right fix is to create a new API called
>
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 11:58 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> I took a look at the IDLE implementation last night and felt it went
> about it the wrong way.
Note that the IDLE implementation got changed (reimplemented) this
morning.
Although the same problems that you mention here still apply.
I
I took a look at the IDLE implementation last night and felt it went
about it the wrong way.
Firstly, the added camel_stream_[read,write]_nb() and
camel_stream_read_idle() functionality is totally unnecessary and just
makes the camel stream API gross (not to mention duplicating a lot of
code as th
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 14:15 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Hi there,
> Using this changeset you can follow the changes to camel-lite:
>
> http://tinymail.org/trac/tinymail/changeset/2823
>
This changeset are a bunch of compilation warnings for Matthew's Base64
patch to Camel: http://tiny
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 14:15 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Hi there,
> Using this changeset you can follow the changes to camel-lite:
>
> http://tinymail.org/trac/tinymail/changeset/2823
More such commits to Tinymail's camel-lite happened today. Nearly all of
those are merging work in act
Hi there,
I got notified that some Evolution hackers are interested in bringing
the features of camel-lite to camel. This is of course excellent news!
To ease this process, I pushed all the recent changes that happened to
camel, to camel-lite. These changes include the copyright's address
changes
