> Hi
>
> Many novice users don't understand the Reply and Reply All buttons, so
> they
> often pick one at random or always use just one of them. Just think of
> people
> that reply to chain letters.
>
This is far from the hardest problem Novice users face with evolution.
The worst problem is the
> Believe me, majority of the users prefer avoid too many questions and
> dialogs before any operations they requested. Especially if one has to
> fill up such a dialog before start replying to an email, many may not
> prefer to hit a reply at all ;-).
I can see that.
I just think it seams more l
ahoj,
Am Freitag, den 22.06.2007, 07:13 +0200 schrieb Martin Jeppesen:
> Many novice users don't understand the Reply and Reply All buttons
looking into the "message" menu, you have the "reply to sender" (this is
the long term for "reply") and "reply to all" options, which should
pretty clearly e
I think the "Reply to All" button is pretty important. I just used it
now to reply to your message.
When I click the "Send" button I expect it to do just that: send the
message. I don't want my mail program to be asking me a whole stack of
questions. Worse than that, it will not ask me those ques
Hi Martin,
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 07:13 +0200, Martin Jeppesen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Many novice users don't understand the Reply and Reply All buttons, so they
> often pick one at random or always use just one of them. Just think of people
> that reply to chain letters.
>
I haven't heard of the befor
Hi
Many novice users don't understand the Reply and Reply All buttons, so they
often pick one at random or always use just one of them. Just think of people
that reply to chain letters.
A solution to this could be to remove the Reply All button from the main
toolbar and have only one send button
