Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel local provider and Bug 213072

2007-02-22 Thread Seb James
Hi Philip, I've not done any work on this recently, but I've not forgotten it; just been busy with other things. On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 05:44 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: [snip] If you want to implement a specialised version for spool folders, fill in the function pointer like this: (in

Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel local provider and Bug 213072

2007-02-22 Thread Seb James
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 22:52 +, Seb James wrote: Hi Philip, I've not done any work on this recently, but I've not forgotten it; just been busy with other things. On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 05:44 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: [snip] If you want to implement a specialised version for spool

Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel local provider and Bug 213072

2007-01-16 Thread Seb James
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 05:44 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: Hey Seb, Thanks for your interest in wanting to improve Camel. Multiple projects would benefit from your contributions, so I'll explain how you can implement what you want to try to do (not sure if your specific feature makes a lot

[Evolution-hackers] camel local provider and Bug 213072

2007-01-14 Thread Seb James
Hi List, I'm looking at the local provider for camel, written by Michael Zucchi. It seems to be related to Bug 213072, which is now rather old, and which affects me. I'm trying to understand the code to begin with. I use a standard unix mail spool as my inbox, and I am wondering why it is that