On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 13:51 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 10:18 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > This sounds really great. If you have the bugs/patches please post them
> > across.
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425464
Looks fine. Approved on bugzilla.
-Srin
2007/4/2, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:03 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
> > I'd also love to create scripts, code and test data to test
> > performance of some of the most important functions. Then we would be
> > able to track performance over time in a more scientifi
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 10:18 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> This sounds really great. If you have the bugs/patches please post them
> across.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425464
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 10:18 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> This sounds really great. If you have the bugs/patches please post them
> across.
e-vcard.c | 494 +-
1 file changed, 232 insertions(+), 262 deletions(-)
Urgh. Give me a m
Ross,
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:11 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:03 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
> > I'd also love to create scripts, code and test data to test
> > performance of some of the most important functions. Then we would be
> > able to track performance over time i
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:03 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
> I'd also love to create scripts, code and test data to test
> performance of some of the most important functions. Then we would be
> able to track performance over time in a more scientific way.
http://burtonini.com/bzr/eds-tests/
Check
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 01:12 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
> I discovered a bottleneck for addressbook performance with large
> addressbooks. Details at
> http://n800evolution.blogspot.com/2007/04/libebook-scalability.html
>
> A proposed fix is attached. I'm not sure if order matters when
> returned
2007/4/2, Srinivasa Ragavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 01:12 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
> > I discovered a bottleneck for addressbook performance with large
> > addressbooks. Details at
> > http://n800evolution.blogspot.com/2007/04/libebook-scalability.html
> Looks fine to commi
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 01:12 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
> I discovered a bottleneck for addressbook performance with large
> addressbooks. Details at
> http://n800evolution.blogspot.com/2007/04/libebook-scalability.html
Looks fine to commit.
>
> A proposed fix is attached. I'm not sure if order
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 01:12 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
> I discovered a bottleneck for addressbook performance with large
> addressbooks. Details at
> http://n800evolution.blogspot.com/2007/04/libebook-scalability.html
>
> A proposed fix is attached. I'm not sure if order matters when
> returned
I discovered a bottleneck for addressbook performance with large
addressbooks. Details at
http://n800evolution.blogspot.com/2007/04/libebook-scalability.html
A proposed fix is attached. I'm not sure if order matters when
returned from the backend? Does anyone know? If not, g_list_reverse
can be o
11 matches
Mail list logo