On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 21:25 +0100, Anna Marei wrote:
> What about Evoulution?
Hi,
just for the record, there's filled:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792045
for it.
Bye,
Milan
___
evolution-hackers mailing list
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 01:55 +0100, Ángel wrote:
> - Adding a UI option of "encrypt with autocrypt" (?)
> - Figure out how and where to implement in the composer the option to
> encrypt or not, it needs querying the autocrypt backend in order to
> show
> a state of enabled/available but
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 16:32 +0100, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> How feasible is it, though, to implement this as a plugin to
> Evolution?
> AFAIU it would need to be able to get the context in terms of what
> headers the currently replied-to email has.
Hi,
I read the project page only briefly,
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 10:12 -0500, Martin Owens wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 13:45 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> > thus there's a problem with interoperability (at the moment)
> > and basically no use for it in corporate environments (read: with
> > Outlook users), thus definitely no high priority
On 2018-01-02 12:45, Milan Crha wrote:
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 21:25 +0100, Anna Marei wrote:
What about Evoulution?
thus there's a problem with interoperability (at the moment)
and basically no use for it in corporate environments (read: with
Outlook users)
Pitching it as a chicken and egg
Hi.
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 13:45 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> The
> biggest problem is that the whole thing depends on the mail
> applications, as both ends should use clients which understand the
> feature, thus there's a problem with interoperability (at the moment)
> and basically no use for it
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 13:45 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> thus there's a problem with interoperability (at the moment)
> and basically no use for it in corporate environments (read: with
> Outlook users), thus definitely no high priority for me. Once you
> have
> a feature request filled you can also
