Hey Ray,
If you're building Gnome 2.4, try
http://www.gnome.org/start/2.4/notes/rninstallation.html
HTH and good luck :)
Steve
Raymond Lillard wrote:
Dear Hackers,
I am finally giving up on text-based mail readers and would like
to use (and help test) evolution. I noticed the latest ve
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 20:29 -0800, Raymond Lillard wrote:
> Dear Hackers,
>
> I am finally giving up on text-based mail readers and would like
> to use (and help test) evolution. I noticed the latest version
> seems to be 1.5.1. I have pulled it from the anon CVS server and
> find that I need to
Dear Hackers,
I am finally giving up on text-based mail readers and would like
to use (and help test) evolution. I noticed the latest version
seems to be 1.5.1. I have pulled it from the anon CVS server and
find that I need to update much of gnome also. That didn't seem
so bad so I looked at th
these files necessary for me to create preprocessed source
> files?
>
> JB
>
> >From: Jeffrey Stedfast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Jeff Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building Evolution from sou
tion-hackers] Building Evolution from source
Date: 26 Jun 2003 15:06:50 -0400
you need the -devel packages.
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 14:46, Jeff Bartlett wrote:
> I successfully installed the gnome-libs, but now it is telling me that I
> don't have the correct version of GTK. I do have GTK
newer. How can I force configure to
> find my GTK?
>
> Thanks,
> JB
>
> (Evolution 1.2.0)
>
> >From: Mark Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Jeff Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Build
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jeff Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Building Evolution from source
Date: 24 Jun 2003 14:37:14 -0400
Do you have gnome-libs installed? If you're using package management,
you'll need gnome-libs-devel as we
What exactly do you mean by "preprocessed"? Preprocessed by the c
preprocessor? Why would you want such a thing? Curious ...
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 05:56, A. Gunes Koru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Related to that question.. Is there anyone who knows how to create a
> preprocessed file for "each source
Hi,
Related to that question.. Is there anyone who knows how to create a
preprocessed file for "each source file" in one version of Evolution -that
version might be an older version - in a mass production fashion similar to
build process.
Is there already a target in the makefiles (or in the m
Do you have gnome-libs installed? If you're using package management,
you'll need gnome-libs-devel as well. If you're not building everything
from scratch, it might do us some good to know what distro you're
running.
You've read the README in the root directory of the source tarball?
gnome-libs
Hi,
I am new to Evolution and I am trying to build version 1.2.0 from source,
with the ultimate goal being producing preprocessed source files. I am
working in the following environment:
OS: RedHat 9.0 (Linux)
CPU: Intel P3 900 MHz
RAM: 128 Mb
I began by running the configure script and got the
I had the exact same problem, and managed to solve it.
The problem is due to some internal functions in glib 1.x having different
return values than the same functions in glib 2.x. So for some reason you
have evolution linking to both glib 1.x and glib 2.x. In my case it was due
to soup. Soup w
Do you have write access go ~/ ?
I'm not really sure, perhaps you could try using strace to see what
calls are really failing.
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 09:21, Matt Rose wrote:
> I finally got evolution to build from source, using GARNOME as a base, and
> then installing gtkhtml, gal and libsoup from
13 matches
Mail list logo
