Re: [Evolution-hackers] Question about evo for gtk2

2003-01-16 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 22:38, Louis Garcia wrote: > Is evolution going to still require db3-3.1.17 for storing the address > book? yes > I would like to see it stored in an xml file. this would make it unbearably slow, either that or hog memory worse than a pig that's been starved for a few day

[Evolution-hackers] Question about evo for gtk2

2003-01-16 Thread Louis Garcia
Is evolution going to still require db3-3.1.17 for storing the address book? I would like to see it stored in an xml file. This would be easier to maintain since modern distros don't even carry this old version of db3. --Lou ___ evolution-hackers mail

[Evolution-hackers] OS X Version

2003-01-16 Thread Chris Ford
Good morning all. I tried to look through the archives for an answer to this question but didn't find it. Is anyone currently working on or planning on a version for Mac OS X? I have found the Fink project and I see that it is possible to get 1.0.7 running. But it would be nice to have a ve