Am Mon, 2002-04-01 um 18.10 schrieb Rodrigo Moya:
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 17:25, Max Horn wrote:
At 12:16 Uhr +0200 01.04.2002, Max Horn wrote:
I am trying to merge my OS X changes into CVS. Actually i did that,
so now I want to test it, but my autogen.sh run fails with this
message:
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 12:20, Max Horn wrote:
At 11:21 Uhr +0200 02.04.2002, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Are you sure? Did you look at the Makefile.am? I did look at it, and
it looks perfectly valid to me. No double use of EXTRA_DIST for
example.
There is a double use of EXTRA_DIST here: it
At 12:16 Uhr +0200 01.04.2002, Max Horn wrote:
I am trying to merge my OS X changes into CVS. Actually i did that,
so now I want to test it, but my autogen.sh run fails with this
message:
[...]
autoheader: config.h.in is unchanged
Running automake --gnu ...
help/C/Makefile.am:1: EXTRA_DIST
OK, I just installed automake 1.6, this was very interesting. Besides
tons of weird warnings, this error still shows up, though automake
seems to go on working anyway... I wonder, what automake version are
you guys using? Still one of the 1.4x ones?
Yes, most of the GNOME 1.4 platform is
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 17:25, Max Horn wrote:
At 12:16 Uhr +0200 01.04.2002, Max Horn wrote:
I am trying to merge my OS X changes into CVS. Actually i did that,
so now I want to test it, but my autogen.sh run fails with this
message:
[...]
autoheader: config.h.in is unchanged
Running
OK, I just installed automake 1.6, this was very interesting. Besides
tons of weird warnings, this error still shows up, though automake
seems to go on working anyway... I wonder, what automake version are
you guys using? Still one of the 1.4x ones?
1.4 generally. I remember having huge
At 10:27 Uhr -0500 01.04.2002, Dan Winship wrote:
OK, I just installed automake 1.6, this was very interesting. Besides
tons of weird warnings, this error still shows up, though automake
seems to go on working anyway... I wonder, what automake version are
you guys using? Still one of the
